Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

QUESTIONABLE STUFF 😵‍💫

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#106

Started by bella! [Ignore] 13,Aug,23 07:15  other posts
This thread is for questionable content. WHY? Just because! I am someone who enjoys the Hodge Twins. YEP, the Hodge Twins. They probably make the hairs on the back of a WOKE person stand straight up! Anyway.....

New Comment       Rating: 0  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 11:20 other posts 
New york does something stupid again,
Preventing a robot from helping teach.
Could save 1000's in salary and other exspenses,
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 11:38 other posts 
They just said “Prove it is safe before putting it near children!”.

The robot costs $57,000 and it cannot do anything more than
a tablet with a $20–$30/month ChatGPT voice subscription.

Who is going to pay for your robot, when Trump is gutting education funding?
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 13:50 other posts 
The cost of the robot,of course the tax payers would pay it. BUT in the LONG TERM, what really matters, the cost would be made up in wage savings, no workers comp,no insurance,no retirement and so on having to be paid.

The robot being used here is crude,and perhaps it should be more inter active,but for whatever reason,people are to concerned with the privacy of kids,which there should be none until they are 18 because they are under the care of parents and guardians. Gutting funding,or just cutting waste?
Why not implement tech in our schools? Why have schools when kids could learn at home with robotic tech?It was supposedly ok during covid? why not all the time, It would be safe if their MOTHERS were there at home to care for them as they should be instead of out working to pay for child care?thus eliminating their primary job of caring for the offspring?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 15:31 other posts 
Of course it's important to integrate tech into the classrooms, because kids today need to learn skills that cannot be replaced by robots and AI. Working with AI is the most important skill for that. But don't think you can replace a teacher with AI any soon. What do you think kids will do, if they are left alone with AI or a robot, for only a few minutes?

Exactly because that robot is still crude, it isn't worth using the money for that. Have you not heard how many teachers are buying supplies from their own money, because funding is getting cut too short?

What is waste? This is the best definition that I can find: Waste is public spending that consumes resources without reasonably advancing the legally authorized objective of the expenditure, or that achieves that objective at substantially greater cost than a practical alternative.

It's waste, if you spend $57,000 on something that can be achieved fully with $300
and a $30/month subscription. If something added has a 10% advantage, you don't pay 19,000% more for it.

If the robot is used to teach programming of robotics software, for kids who are at that level, then it's a whole other thing. That can be worth every dollar.

Mothers are forced to work, because the cost of living crisis makes it impossible to live on just one income. I don't think that it's only the woman's job to care for children. Women should be able to have careers too, so they are not dependent on men.
Men are just as important to the development of children as women, so both the parenting and the career should be shared among them.

I get criticized by your political side for using AI to find some data. They argue that it's completely unreliable. And now you telling me that it's a good idea to hand over the education of children to an AI teacher, to save some money. I didn't expect that.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 17:54 other posts 
I would rather ,much rather, a human teach our kids.
BUT Humans are so biased, try to push their personal ideals onto the kids and etc that it has become a problem. Not to mention the teachers constantly demanding more money as if the pool of funds their salary's come from are bottomless.
We have some of the dumbest kids in the world graduating from our schools. It's not all the kids fault ,nor the parents.it is the schools fault for the most part not taking time to teach. Ai could easily detect a kid having issues, instantly find a solution to the problem. Ai could use what is distracting the kid to the good. Perhaps the kid is interested in nature, use counting monkeys and trees as a learning tool for the 1'st grader age to help them learn math? Can a teacher do that? for each kid?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 18:19 other posts 
Teachers salaries in the US have not even kept up with inflation in the last 30 years. They lost ground significantly, especially relative to other professionals.

Your whole country is politicized and biased. It's only logical that teachers are included in that trend. It has been going on in relation to religion for a long time. We have Christian teachers too, but they have never outright refused to teach evolution.
About 28% consistently taught evolution as the scientific consensus.
About 13% explicitly advocated creationism or intelligent design.
About 60% took an "avoidance" approach, teaching evolution incompletely or presenting it as controversial, rather than as the foundation of modern biology.
That means that 72% are not doing their job as they should.

Kids are getting dumber, because your whole society is worshiping stupidity. That's because of your side turning away from facts, critical thinking and science. Your politicians were literally banning schoolbooks, because it mentioned or explained critical thinking. There is a brain drain ongoing in your country, because educated people are leaving. A 2025 Nature poll of more than 1,600 U.S.-based researchers found that about 75% of respondents said they were considering leaving the U.S. Many mentioned Europe and Canada as possible destinations. Other countries are trying to recruit them. Universities and research organizations in Europe, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere have been positioning themselves to attract researchers
who are frustrated with US conditions.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 15:27 other posts 
Just spoke to a carreer teacher awhile ago, said the new teachers only make 8000 less than teachers with 20+ years, that is a bit odd. but I feel like teacher pay should be directly linked to the test scores of their students.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Aug,26 12:28 other posts 
Sure, if they score liberal, pay them double, if they score MAGA, pay them half.
By phart [Ignore] 03,Aug,26 14:10 other posts 
No No ding dong! You know what I am talking about,the SAT scores and such? If the students are good in math and reading and writing,then the teacher gets paid better than if they score poorly.


By phart [Ignore] 20,Jul,26 21:26 other posts 
Another case of I can't believe they have the gall to do this.
only registered users can see external links
By bella! [Ignore] 20,Jul,26 22:07 other posts 
Isn’t it amazing that Mr. Ortiz-Vite is concerned about the shame that was brought to his family because President Trump stand on illegal immigration.

Of course $75 million, a public apology, and "naturalization to this beautiful country” is in order! Perhaps the next Democrat President will make Mr. Ortiz-Vite’s demands come true!
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 10:30 other posts 
more than likely,along with a pardon
By CAT52! [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 11:20 other posts 
You and Phart are being ridiculous. There are delusional people everywhere. To think that this is anything more and that Democrats, President or not, would listen to it cheapens your characterization of what the whole fabric of the American public is like or about.
I can understand Phart thinking like this but, you Bella? It must be getting very hot in La Belle. 😥
Native-born Americans still account for a larger percentage of homicides.

2013–2022 homicide convictions in Texas:
Group ---------------------- Homicide convictions ----- homicide conviction rate
Native-born Americans ---------- 7,109 ----------------- 3.0 per 100,000
Undocumented immigrants ------- 472 ----------------- 2.2 per 100,000
Legal immigrants -------------------- 336 ----------------- 1.2 per 100,000
By phart [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 07:10 other posts 
Well regardless, if those legal and illegal immigrants were not here, there would be 808 innocent people still alive. Deny that math.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 07:26 other posts 
If the Native-born Americans were gone, there would be 7,109 innocent people
still alive. Deny that math.
--------------------------------------- added after 23 hours

By the way, can I ask how many generations it takes to become a 'native'?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 15:32 other posts 
From the FBI, “ The majority of individuals identified as offenders in murder cases are non-Hispanic.”
Phart, that leaves out your pet racial biased group. 🤣🤣
By phart [Ignore] 25,Jul,26 18:53 other posts 
Majority ,that still leaves the minority dumb dumb, but just go by any of the local jails around here and see just who is in them
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 08:33 other posts 
And your side is doing its best to keep it that way.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 09:56 other posts 
If that’s your beef then you should be happy they are incarcerated
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 11:05 other posts 
not complaining,but the dumb dumb was me callin you dumb dumb,not the minority,because if the minority wasn't here, those 800+ would still be alive,you weren't paying attention.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 16:59 other posts 
They are just a small part of the minority, dumb dumb.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 17:12 other posts 
so 800+ lives don't matter since they are just a "small" part?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 16:16 other posts 
Why do you put words in peoples mouths
By phart [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 16:44 other posts 
Why do you devalue human lives just because the numbers are smaller?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 31,Jul,26 08:48 other posts 
Why do you believe i do? I don’t want anyone to be hurt, much less lose their lives. You equate political views with bad intentions. I see people. All kinds of people. Some are good. Some are bad. The bad ones should be made to pay but the good ones should be given a chance. There’s a huge difference between walking across a frontier and hurting or killing people. You should know that.
Immigrants are human lives too. If they are fleeing war or a regime that has turned criminal, then giving them asylum is SAVING lives. That's not accepting the deaths of anyone else, because as I have already showed you, those people are less of a risk to commit violent crimes, than native-born Americans.

Our homicide/manslaughter death rate is 0.68 per 100,000. By YOUR logic,
we should ban those violent Americans from coming to our country. Fortunately,
we understand that they are freedom and science refugees, who are fleeing
a fascist regime, that they don't agree with. Still, we should vet them carefully, because it appears that lust for murder and violence is IN YOUR GENES.


By bella! [Ignore] 02,Aug,26 17:51 other posts 
Well “shut her mouth”…..

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 01,Aug,26 09:11 other posts 
10 clever ways to use a sanitary pad. Yeah, you read that correctly, sanitary pad, ie KOTEX PAD! Whoduh thunk!?

only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 31,Jul,26 20:11 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

Ah, maybe go back to russia and stay? Might find a big old gal in a grey dress to dominate her every night?


By phart [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 15:00 other posts 
This is the type of overregulation I despise. We need robotics here in the US in manufacturing and home care ,be it vacuuming or mowing or whatever. and humaniod robots could adapt to the existing systems of stairs and elevators and such. only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 15:29 other posts 
Is it the problem that they make regulations that a robot vacuum clearer shouldn't be
a spy device or the fact that most of them apparently failed those regulations?
They won't be banned, because there is no ban against putting WiFi security cameras
in every room of your house either, they just want similar network security precautions
on the robots. It sounds like common sense to me.

Possibly, you can trace this kind of regulation to a single politician, who owns such a thing, and doesn't want it to be used to uncover his dirty secrets.


By phart [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 17:49 other posts 
Europeans in America
only registered users can see external links
Another 1 I watched, the folks were totally just mesmerized by of all things, Ranch dressing!
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 04:49 other posts 
At least one or two were intended to make fun of you. I hope you caught that.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 04:45 other posts 
Trump administration demands hospitals share personal emergency room records.
This will require participating hospitals to provide personally identifiable patient information, including names, addresses, diagnoses, and other medical details, to the CPSC's contractor.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 29,Jul,26 21:22 other posts 
I never realized that the majority of women’s problems begin with MEN….

only registered users can see external links
By dgraff [Ignore] 29,Jul,26 21:30 other posts 
I can’t argue with that
By whatsupcocks [Ignore] 30,Jul,26 01:34 other posts 
That's a good one. I had to archive that one.
manure, manipulation, menace, maleficent


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 29,Jul,26 07:28 other posts 
Sean Lock and Jon Richardson's legendary carrot in a box showdown
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 28,Jul,26 14:21 other posts 
So much for that love and tolerance in the netherregions!
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Jul,26 17:25 other posts 
The situation in the central registration center for asylum seekers is absolutely awful.
Don't expect me to defend that. The immigrants aren't welcomed with open arms
by the people who live there either. That's the people who vote for Geert Wilders.

However, what I don't get is why a software engineer from the US has to go through
Ter Apel. We have the Dutch-American Friendship Treaty (DAFT).
All an American has to do to get in is:
1. You must be a U.S. citizen.
A U.S. passport is required. Having only a U.S. green card is not enough.
2. You must start or operate your own business in the Netherlands.
This can be a sole proprietorship, a private limited company (BV), or another legitimate business structure. The business must be genuine and actively operated.
3. You must invest at least €4,500 in your business.
This money is your own business capital, it is not a fee paid to the Dutch government. The funds must remain available to the business.
4. You must register your business with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (KvK).
The business must be officially registered.
5. You must apply for a Dutch residence permit under DAFT.
The Dutch Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) processes the application.
6. Your business must remain active.
When you renew your residence permit, the IND will check that your business is a real, ongoing enterprise. There is no fixed minimum income requirement, but the business cannot exist only on paper.

That's why so many Americans start a YouTube channel. The money is exactly what you need for a good camera and microphone set and an editing PC with enough storage.
Then they make videos about how they love their life here.

A transgender from the US has a very slim chance to be accepted as a refugee,
because the US is considered to be a safe country.

So your story doesn't make sense. Or he is a very dumb American who didn't know that.


By bella! [Ignore] 23,Jul,26 17:40 other posts 
So sad that this goes on in our colleges and universities.

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 10:09 other posts 
You mean cops being stubborn assholes who are only interested in escalating
every conflict?
By bella! [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 20:23 other posts 
Your post should not surprise me…….. you are so far left that you blame the police! Perhaps the police in the Netherlands brew a pot of tea and bring in some lovely finger sandwiches to de-escalate a situation. YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!
By phart [Ignore] 25,Jul,26 18:52 other posts 
Some folks think all it takes is a few choice words to fix any problem. They are so naive it is only by pure luck and chance they are still alive.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Jul,26 05:02 other posts 
"pure luck and chance they are still alive" because obviously cops should just
kill people who shout at them! FUCKING FASCIST!!!

This is why you are showing that you are NOT AN AMERICAN:

1. First Amendment – Freedom of Speech
o The First Amendment protects the right to criticize the government and its officials, including police officers.
o Simply shouting, insulting, or verbally criticizing an officer is generally protected speech, unless it crosses into categories like a "true threat" or incitement.

2. Fourth Amendment – Protection Against Unreasonable Seizures
o A police shooting is considered a "seizure" of a person.
o Under Supreme Court precedent, officers may use deadly force only when it is objectively reasonable under the circumstances.
o Someone merely yelling at an officer, without posing an imminent threat of serious harm, would not justify deadly force.

3. Fifth Amendment (federal government) and Fourteenth Amendment (states)
o Both contain Due Process Clauses, which protect against deprivation of life without due process of law.
o Since most policing is done by state and local officers, the Fourteenth Amendment is especially important because it applies constitutional protections against state governments.

Key Supreme Court cases
• Tennessee v. Garner
o The Court held that police generally may not use deadly force against a fleeing suspect unless the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury.

• Graham v. Connor
o The Court established that police use of force must be judged under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard.

• City of Houston v. Hill
o The Court struck down a law that broadly criminalized interrupting police officers, emphasizing that the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police.
Your side made it so people like this person cannot transition to the identity they have
on the inside, even withholding puberty blockers from them. Then when a trans-woman doesn't look feminine enough, your side misgenders them and makes fun of them
for being angry about it.

Would you like it, if a cop was calling you "Sir", after they were called to deal with you
because some assholes calling you "Sir" made you angry?

Yes, I'm blaming those cops for participating in your culture war.
Their job is to protect and serve, not being pawns for your politics.
By bella! [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 11:51 other posts 
So in the Netherlands when your police have an encounter with a man in a wig, blue, pink or any other color and mismatched socks, your police are inclined to address the man as “Miss” and immediately choose feminine pronouns?

Just because HE CHOOSES to wear a long hair wig and fun socks and scream in a high pitched voice does NOT make him a female/woman.

only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 15:56 other posts 
The Dutch police generally provide training in professional and respectful communication with citizens, which includes treating people in an inclusive manner and addressing them appropriately. This may include respecting a person’s preferred name, form of address, and pronouns when these are made known.

However, there is not necessarily a single, nationwide training program in which all officers receive extensive instruction specifically about gender identity or pronoun use. The level of attention given to these topics may vary depending on the police unit, role, and training context.

In practice, officers are expected to communicate respectfully and take a person’s stated preferences into account where possible. Mistakes can happen, for example when someone’s preferred pronouns are not known or out of habit, and these are not automatically intentional. However, if someone is repeatedly or deliberately addressed incorrectly after clarifying their pronouns, they can raise the issue with the officer involved or submit a complaint to the police.

DUH!!! That's why they want to use puberty blockers; to stop looking more and more like a man, while you identify as a women. Or to stop growing tits and wide hips, if you are born as a woman, but identify as a man.

By the way, most of the gender affirming care, given to children, is for boys who have a genetic or hormone abnormality, that results in them developing breasts. Those boys are hurt by your ideology too.

Meanwhile, Pete Kegsbreath is announcing that male service members aged 30
and above should be checked to ensure they have the “right testosterone levels”
and should get testosterone treatment, if they have low levels. He is literally asking
for gender affirming care for one group, while denying it to others.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 12:59 other posts 
if it quacks like a duck,looks like a duck,it is probably a duck.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 16:00 other posts 
I just told you that your country has banned puberty blockers for minors and is very much cracking down on transition surgery for adults. That results in people like this person not looking the part. Your side did that to this person. And to make it worse, then you disrespect them for what YOU DID TO THEM. I understand their anger.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Jul,26 21:28 other posts 
he made a choice to try and change who and what he is, I nor anyone else made that choice. Therefore, as with any choices we make as humans, he can learn to cope with the results. Until 10-12 year olds can buy cigarettes and vote,they don't have the brains to know the difference of male and female and until they are 18,should not be altered in any way what so ever.
like I said ,if it looks like a duck ,it probably is 1. If police come up to a walking freak show, they should not be expected to cater to the persons ridicules appearance and actions. their job is to maintain law and ORDER. and someone like this is disrupting order and peace in the community.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 12:37 other posts 
It's as much a choice as for you to turn gay.
Or do you think that being gay is a choice too?
By phart [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 13:26 other posts 
It is something you could control, so basically yes, you could choose not to be gay or anything else.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 15:06 other posts 
No, you cannot chose to be gay if you're not or chose not be gay if you are.
You are what you are. You can chose to deny it, of course.
But why should they do that? Just because of you?
By phart [Ignore] 27,Jul,26 15:18 other posts 
Not because of me, but because of the undue stress they put on themselves and the undue expectations of others to accept what is'nt real. Can't you see in everyday life the added stress's on society when just a few folks decide to go against the social grain? The lawsuits from people going into the bathroom they want to instead of the 1 that matches their birth certificate? What happened in Germany over the weekend? People died because of their choice to go against the grain of society. why is it the gay men and lesbians that have lived in my community for decades haven't caused 1 single problem? They live their lives, they work,they support each other, without making a fuss and acting a fool the ladies I worked for several times down the road, were polite,paid well and have been good neighbors. but this guy ,i doubt he has a clue how to be a good neighbor, he is just out to make a ruckus.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Jul,26 04:10 other posts 
OMG, undue expectations? They just want to be accepted for who they are.

These people have development abnormalities, just like people who have other non-lethal abnormalities in their bodies. I never heard you say that someone with Autism, Cerebral palsy or Epilepsy should just ACT NORMAL, but because of some weird obsession with sex and 'sex' identity, you lot are denying THIS.

What happened in Germany is that religious and culturally inspired ignorance and hate, resulted in some fuckwit starting to kill people who are celebrating FREEDOM!!!

Persisting in the claim that it isn't real is just ignorance. To make you a bit more aware, I put below the process, as far as science has unraveled it today, of just the development of a fertilized egg into a girl/women, with all the primary and secondary sex characteristics, fertility, sexual identity and heterosexual attraction. When everything goes correctly, we get a straight cis-female/woman.

If I added the information for a boy/man, my comment would span several pages. Male development has one particularly vulnerable feature: it depends on the successful activation of the SRY → SOX9 pathway and the production and action of testicular hormones during a relatively narrow developmental window. Many chromosomal abnormalities lead to miscarriage before birth, so the patterns seen in live births don't necessarily reflect how often they occur initially. That leaves all the men with non-lethal variations in their sex/gender/sexual attraction development.

Development into a girl/woman
1. Chromosomes
Usually:
• 46 chromosomes
• XX sex chromosomes
However, simply having XX is not sufficient by itself. The genes on those chromosomes—and on the other 44 chromosomes (autosomes)—must also function normally.
There are exceptions:
• Turner syndrome (45,X)
• Mosaic XX/XO
• XX individuals with differences of sex development
• Rare XX males due to translocation of the SRY gene
So chromosomes are the starting blueprint, not the whole story.
________________________________________
2. Genes
Scientists estimate that well over 1,000 genes contribute in some way to sex differentiation, fertility, brain development, and puberty.
Only about 50–100 genes are considered major regulators of sex development.
Some of the best known include:
Ovarian development
• WNT4
• RSPO1
• FOXL2
• DAX1 (NR0B1)
These actively promote ovarian development.
________________________________________
Suppression of testis development
Female development is not simply "default."
Genes actively suppress the male pathway.
Examples:
• WNT4
• RSPO1
• FOXL2
________________________________________
Hormone production
Genes involved include:
• CYP19A1 (aromatase)
• CYP17A1
• STAR
• HSD17B enzymes
• CYP11A1
These produce estrogen and progesterone.
________________________________________
Hormone receptors
Examples:
• ESR1 (estrogen receptor alpha)
• ESR2
• PGR (progesterone receptor)
Without functioning receptors, hormones cannot work properly.
________________________________________
Fertility
Many additional genes are required.
Examples:
• FSHR
• LHCGR
• BMP15
• GDF9
• NOBOX
Hundreds more participate in ovarian function.
________________________________________
Brain development
Many genes that influence:
• hypothalamus
• limbic system
• pituitary regulation
• social behavior
also contribute indirectly.
Scientists estimate hundreds of genes are involved.
________________________________________
3. Hormones before birth (mother's womb)
Female fetal development requires relatively low androgen exposure compared with male development, but it is still hormonally regulated.
Important hormones include:
• maternal estrogens
• placental estrogens
• progesterone
• human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
• fetal adrenal steroids
• insulin-like growth factors
• thyroid hormones
• anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is generally absent at male-typical levels
Interestingly,
female internal reproductive organs develop primarily because they are not exposed to high levels of AMH and testosterone during critical developmental windows.
________________________________________
4. Hormones after birth
During childhood and especially puberty:
• estrogen
• progesterone
• FSH
• LH
• GnRH
• growth hormone
• IGF-1
• prolactin
• thyroid hormones
• adrenal hormones
work together.
________________________________________
5. Development of primary sex characteristics
Requires coordinated development of:
• ovaries
• uterus
• cervix
• vagina
• fallopian tubes
This involves:
• genes
• hormone signaling
• receptors
• embryonic tissue interactions
________________________________________
6. Secondary sex characteristics
At puberty:
• breast development
• wider pelvis
• fat distribution
• reduced muscle mass
• menstrual cycles
• body hair pattern
• voice characteristics
depend largely on estrogen and progesterone.
________________________________________
7. Fertility
Requires successful development of:
• ovaries
• follicles
• ovulation
• uterus
• endocrine cycles
• cervix
• hypothalamus
• pituitary
Hundreds of genes contribute.
________________________________________
8. Gender identity
Current evidence suggests gender identity arises from a combination of:
• genetics
• prenatal hormone exposure
• brain development
• later life experiences
Twin studies indicate a genetic contribution, but no single "gender identity gene" has been identified. Many genes likely each contribute a small effect, interacting with developmental processes.
________________________________________
9. Sexual orientation
Similarly, research suggests sexual orientation reflects:
• many genetic influences
• prenatal hormonal environment
• early brain development
• other biological factors that remain incompletely understood
Large genetic studies indicate there is no single "heterosexual gene" or "homosexual gene." Instead, many genetic variants each contribute a very small amount, alongside non-genetic developmental influences.
Do you want your political side to be cruel to a woman who has abnormal hair growth
or baldness or a low voice or a masculine facial bone structure, and call them "SIR"?
I expect that you wouldn't. So what is it that you cannot accept that some people
have a development abnormality with their sexual attraction or sexual identity?


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#106



Show your Genitals