Indeed, it wasn't, Muslims didn't even exist back then.
The city was named after the Greek Alexander the Great, who conquered Egypt
in 332 BCE, a Greek ruling class was established there, and Greek culture
became dominant in many urban centers, especially Alexandria.

However, the Islamic Golden Age was deeply influenced by Greek science, philosophy, and medicine. Islamic scholars translated key Greek texts into Arabic, especially from Aristotle, Plato, Galen, Hippocrates, Ptolemy, and others.
Centers like the House of Wisdom in Baghdad became hubs for translating, studying, and expanding on Greek knowledge.
Mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and philosophy from Greek sources
were adopted, critiqued, and advanced. The Islamic world actually continued where Greece stagnated, because Greece was under Byzantine Rule (the Eastern Roman Empire). Compared to the Islamic world, Byzantine scientific output was limited. Greece was preserving Greek culture, but most scientific innovation had moved to the Islamic world, where scholars were actively studying, critiquing,
and expanding on ancient Greek knowledge.

The Byzantine Empire was Christian, and it squashed Greek science.
The religion they had before that was Polytheistic, worshiping gods like Zeus, Athena, Apollo, and Poseidon. Apparently that religion was more conducive to science and enlightenment, than Christianity was. So was Islam at that time.
Obviously, Romans did pretty well in science before they turned to Christianity.
Not to say that there were no Christian scientists, but they often had to fear
for their lives if they challenged doctrines. It slowed down progress a lot.
I think it's fair to say that Christianity slowed down science and enlightenment,
for the longest period of all major religions in our history.

How did Biden shit all over every country that used to be your ally?
Do you ever THINK, before you say something?

You are only capable of talking about the thing that's living inside your brain
at that very moment, I see. How is this an answer to what I was saying?

But don't be stupid man, we are far from defenseless.
Iran is far weaker than Russia, and I don't think Russia could even conquer Europe. They could however be stupid enough to try, if Ukraine goes well for them, causing a lot of damage and a lot of young people to die. Russia has never cared the slightest about sending their young people to die for the glory of the empire, we do. That's why we need to help Ukraine defend itself to the best of their ability. It will prevent Russia to be motivated to attack NATO (with the US or without). Iran doing the same isn't making
the slightest bit of sense.

Europe spends $450+ billion/year on defense, Iran $10–15 billion/year.
Europe has 2–3 million+ military personnel, Iran: ~600,000.
Europe has ~20,000+ aircraft, advanced stealth jets, aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, Iran has less than 1,000 aircraft (many outdated) no aircraft carriers.
They can do a lot of damage with their Shahed drones, but they have no capability
of conquering any modern country. Germany alone could fend them off easily.
Understand that the attacking force has a HUGE disadvantage.

That 24/7 fear-mongering of your media melted your mind.
Is there any point when you think: "OK, what I said now wasn't that smart."?

The only power that would be able to conquer Europe, besides the US, is China.
They have almost indefinite people and a huge manufacturing capability.
And what is the US doing? Telling China that it's OK to attack other countries. Thanks!

"There are good Jews and there are bad Jews."
If religion is supposed to give people morality, it's clearly
not working.

"Trump is bad to you because the media told you he is bad."
Actually, they don't, they tell me what he's doing, and I decide
that's bad. Unlike the US, we actually have objective media.

You should dislike him more than I do, if you actually want UNITY,
because he's the most divisive person to gain power in decades.
He is cozying up to your former mortal enemies and alienating all your alliances. It's going to hurt your country more than it will mine.

I don't care about unity, I care about cooperation.
People can agree to disagree and work together to benefit all.
I'm attacking your ideology, because it's a threat to cooperation.
I think that's pretty clear from Trump's actions, if you're not a cultist.

Well, you're doing a piss-poor job of showing you're right.
That's not creating the unity you're after.

I was very clear about that; I want them to be free.
But being DEAD is worse than having a tyrannical government.
Living in absolute chaos is worse than a tyrannical government too.
Every time the US meddled in other countries, it became worse for the citizens. I wish you would learn from it and stopped doing it,
or at least got better at it.

To commit a crime, you need Motive, Means and Opportunity.
The Motive they have; check.
Means? They have a decent amount of weapons and personnel, but nowhere near enough to destroy Israel and America. Even if they get a nuke, or a shitload of them, using them would be absolute suicide. The US would vaporize all of them, minutes later.
That's the lack of Opportunity. A criminal is not going to attempt his crime, if the police will catch him immediately.

Why did Russia never nuke you? Did they like you more than Iran?
NO, they hated you just as much, but they didn't want to be destroyed.

You not understanding that means you were not taught to reason, at all.

"They are already taking over Europe." Any more bullshit?

"Trump Turns to Migrant Workers Amid Farm Labor Crisis"
only registered users can see external links

Why the fuck did he first kidnap all of them and deport them to Al Salvador?
WHAT THE FUCK!

That's not what I'm seeing.
There are many Christians going back to pre-enlightenment ideologies.

There are now several high ranked military officers preaching END TIMES!!!
only registered users can see external links

This is their belief:

1) Holy War / Moral Purge – Many Christian nationalists interpret global or domestic conflict as a “holy war” against perceived ungodly forces. This could involve literal or metaphorical battles, often framed as a defense of Christian values.

2) Rise of a Righteous Leader – They often envision a divinely appointed leader (sometimes equated with a modern “king” or U.S. president) who will restore Christian order and enforce God’s law.

3) Persecution of the Faithful / Tribulation – Following initial conflict, believers expect a period of intense trials or persecution, echoing the biblical Tribulation. This can include oppression by secular governments, anti-Christian legislation, or societal collapse.

4) Apocalyptic Signs – Natural disasters, wars, plagues, or astronomical events are seen as signs that the end is near. Many interpret modern geopolitical or environmental crises as fulfilling prophecy.

5) Defeat of Evil / Armageddon – The final confrontation between forces of good and evil, often framed as a literal battle, sometimes associated with the biblical Armageddon.

6) Millennial or Kingdom Era – After evil is vanquished, Christ or a divinely sanctioned ruler is believed to establish a godly reign on Earth—sometimes imagined as a Christian-dominated society or government.

7) Final Judgment – The ultimate end, where the faithful are rewarded and the wicked punished, consistent with traditional Christian eschatology.

For the Jews who tag along with these Christian nationalist ideology;
in step 2 they start the PURGE of the Holy Land, not from Muslims,
but from Jews.
"This is when anti-Semitic interpretations appear most prominently. Some narratives portray a “global persecution” where Israel or Jewish populations
are attacked or coerced as part of the unfolding apocalyptic events. In these views, the “purge” from the Holy Land or the suffering of Jews is part of fulfilling prophecy about trials before the Messiah or the final battle."


I also prefer to live in a Christian society over a Muslim one, or at least as we know them today. We’ve been spoiled by 250 years of liberalism, but currently,
our rights are under attack more than at any time in the last 80 years.

Better start paying attention, because they won't leave you alone for long.

And that's how it started...

Oh, an 'ACTUAL' Christian!?! Someone who's ideals come from Jesus?
I can only think of one in the US; James Talarico.
"Faith calls me to act for others, especially those who are struggling or underserved"
"feed the hungry, care for the sick, and serve the vulnerable";
I don't see many Christians in the US 'ACTUALLY' support that.
But I agree; 'ACTUAL' Christians don't pose much of a threat.
"Turning the other cheek" pretty much rules them out.

At least, if you are not doing financial businesses at 'the temple'.
Maybe look into the financial businesses of your 'temples'?
Christian nationalists are spreading blasphemy, for money from the wealthy.

How about an 'ACTUAL' Muslim?

What a strange argument for calling someone a racist. Racism means treating people unfairly, because of their race or perceived racial characteristics.
Was I treating someone unfairly, for excluding white men as possible Islamic terrorists? Well, I apologize to that white male Islamic terrorist, who ever he may be.

True, some white men are Muslim (1%–1.2%), but how many that 50%-66% are white (male) Islamic terrorists? I assure you, far less than 0.1%.

Here's the self identified religions of mass shooters:
Christian: 40–50%
Atheist/Agnostic/No Religion: 15–25%
Other religions (Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, etc.): 5–10%
Unknown/Undocumented: 20–40%

About the 5–10% other religions: Before you start about me saying that you have
far less than 1% that it's an Islamic terrorist, you don't call the 40–50% Christians
"Christian terrorists". Only when there is a good reason to assume that the religion was the reason for the mass shooting, do we call it religious terrorism.

So you agree that religion is mostly a tool to them.
The same applies to your 'leaders'.

That's what enemies do, they proclaim their hatred towards their enemies.
And yes, you do it too, but not in the exact same way.
Your words might have been softer, but your threats were stronger.
Republican war hawks have been wanting to "Bomb Iran!" for decades.

Netanyahu has been advocating for war with Iran for roughly 30+ years.
He has been saying "Iran is months a way from having nukes!" for decades.

Iran was NOT in the slightest responsible for 9/11. 9/11 was carried out by al-Qaeda. Iran and al-Qaeda are enemies.

Iran = Shia Islamist state
Hezbollah = Shia Islamist militants

Saudi Arabia = Sunni Islam (Salafi/Wahhabi)
al-Qaeda = Sunni extremist terrorists (Salafi-jihadist)
Hamas = Sunni Islamist militants (origin Muslim Brotherhood)

If you don't know these very important facts, people can make you believe nonsense.
al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, is funded by individual Saudi nationals.
The 9/11 hijackers were mostly Saudi nationals. NOT IRAN!
Saudi Arabia are your presidents' best friends, because they make lots of money from oil and selling weapons to them. That's why they want you to blame Iran.

USS Cole bombing (2000): al-Qaeda again. NOT IRAN!

October 7th: Hamas. Indeed funded by Iran. The difference is that Hamas is not anti-Shia, like al-Qaeda, which is very anti-Shia (often considers Shia “heretics”). Hamas is no friend to Iran, but they oppose Israel; “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”.

This is 100% the truth. Go investigate for yourself.

Summary, because you are having trouble understanding basic stuff:
9/11: al-Qaeda, NOT Iran
USS Cole bombing (2000): al-Qaeda, NOT Iran
October 7th: Hamas, funded and armed by Iran

October 7th didn't come from thin air, it was a reaction to what Israel has been doing to the Palestinians for decades. It was fucking horrible, but it was one day of absolute horror as a response to decades of tedious and deliberate torment, in a process intended to take the remaining land from Palestinians. It's a huge military, funded by the strongest military in the world, vs a few radicalized citizens with guns and rockets. That's an unfair fight, and the only respons remaining is 'Guerrilla warfare', which is called 'terrorism' by the powerful enemy. The alternative is being ethnically cleansed in peaceful protest, while the world watches.

You're a mindless puppet, for never accepting anything that is verifiably true,
when it doesn't fit your narrative.

You were clearly mistaken about 9/11 and the USS Cole bombing and everyone
can check for themselves and see. You cannot and will not show me to be wrong
on even one verifiable fact. You're being weak and lazy.

Whenever you want to demonize an enemy, you think up horrible shit they do to babies. You have done it about Russia for decades. Then your president is best friends with them, because it's the only country that still lent him money for his
failing businesses, and you forget decades of hatred in one day and support
their war crimes.

Sure, I agree, since Al-Ghazali they have been stuck in the middle ages.
But it still means that the basis for their religion isn't worse than the basis
of Christianity. Christianity was stuck in the dark ages for 1600 years.
The West only went somewhere when we entered the “Enlightenment Age”.
I would say that the basis of Christianity was worse.
That's a 1th century philosophy that has no place in modern western society.

It's not just his bone spurs that Trump lowered the standards of the presidency with,
it's literally everything about the man. His persona wouldn't be acceptable for a ball players, actors, or any other role models. Sure, possibly for a criminal, but people would shy away from him, if he had any more respectability to keep up than a rapper.

I think it would be a scandal if a rapper called a female journalist 'piggy'.
That's just a small example of the thousands I could give.
Before Trump, it was considered not presidential to wear a tan suit.

Did they call him "vermin" and "scum"?
Dit they call his voters "the enemy within"?

The chance of getting killed by an Islamic terrorist in my country, is lower than the chance of getting hit by lightning.
When YOU get shot, you have far less than 1% that it's an Islamic terrorist.
If you are the victim of a mass shooting, it's 50% - 66% likely to be a white man.

I'm definitely an 'infidel'. I knew the term.
There are 6 billion 'infidels' on this Earth. We'll be OK.

Headlines are politically and commercially motivated.
Politically: They are how politicians and supporters achieve their goals.
Commercially: They are how media companies attract eyeballs.

The US has attacked the most other countries, of all countries in the world.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the United States has carried out about 469 military interventions abroad since 1798. That's a clear #1 ranking.
#2: France with well over 100 campaigns or wars in the same period.
#3: Russia / Soviet Union: 30–40 major external interventions
#4: Germany: around 20–25 major invasions or wars
Muslim countries don't even make it to the list.

Why we fear Muslims so, is because that religion is able to motivate people to do suicide attacks the most. That installs fear in people. However, if you look at the deaths it causes, it's not even close. Jihadist terrorism has killed roughly 200,000
to 400,000 people in the last few decades. Before that, it hardly existed.

Jihadism isn't just a religion, it's a political ideology, just like fascism and communism. Those ideologies become lethal when leaders and movements turn them into absolute truths, promise a utopian future, identify enemies blocking that future, and mobilize followers or state power to eliminate those enemies. There is a difference though, while Islam and communism are not inherently violent, fascism is unique in that violence and domination are central to its ideology.

On pure death rates, Germany is the absolute record holder.

Germany:
World War II alone caused ~70–85 million deaths worldwide.
World War I caused ~15–20 million deaths.
Together: ~85–100 million deaths linked to wars Germany helped start.

Russia / USSR:
Russian Civil War: ~7–12 million deaths
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan: ~1–2 million deaths
Huge share of casualties in World War II (tens of millions)
Total across major conflicts: tens of millions.

United States:
Major wars involving the U.S. include:
Vietnam War: ~2–3 million deaths
Korean War: ~2–3 million deaths
Iraq War: hundreds of thousands (low estimate)
War in Afghanistan: ~170,000+ deaths
Combined wars involving the U.S.: several million deaths.

France:
Algerian War: ~300,000–1 million deaths
First Indochina War: ~400,000–1 million deaths
Total: hundreds of thousands to a few million.

If Islam was inherently evil, there would have never been an Islamic Golden Age, roughly from the 8th to 14th century (≈750–1258 CE), though some scholars extend it to the 15th century. The core period was generally more peaceful than much of contemporary Europe, enabling intellectual and economic growth. Cities like Baghdad, Córdoba, and Cairo became safe havens for scholars, traders, and artists.
Scholars and thinkers enjoyed a moderate degree of intellectual freedom.
Non-Muslims (Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians) often held important positions in administration and science. They offered a far greater religious tolerance than the Christian countries of that period. The Islamic Golden Age was one of exceptional scientific, cultural, and economic achievement. It's why we use Arabic numerals, Algebra is an Arabic word, many stars have Arabic names, why so many Greek, Persian, and Indian texts were preserved and why urbanization, agriculture, and industry thrived, spreading innovations widely.

Which is the same for everyone else on this planet.

No, Trump did not release the files, Congress did.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 18, 2025 with a vote of:
427 — Yes
1 — No
5 — Not voting
Senate: Unanimous approval
It would have been a MASSIVE scandal if Trump hadn't signed it.

The president (Biden) doesn't have the power to release files like that.
It required a law, and Congress passed a law forcing it.

Not enough people cared about it when Biden was president.
It only got enough attention when Epstein got suicided.

What did it start with then?

"Was CAT ever kicked off the site?" I think she was once. Not sure.

No, we are definitely very different in our opinions.

I'm not talking about the verification where people check your verification button, but the verification where you have to present an ID. Maybe I would be able to fake that, but I'm not interested. I don't care to post naked pictures anymore.

If you want to convince people, reaching into their hearts as you say it, is the strongest strategy. And indeed that takes empathy. You're making sense there.

My behavior is very much dependent on how someone else approaches me. Act civil, and I act civil back. I don't even carry a grudge.
I'm not in it to hurt you, my goal is to reach you. Sometimes shock treatment works.
"My purpose here is to develop unity." But, not in the middle, right?

Some of it is copy/paste, but propaganda means that it isn't true and intended to deceive you. I assure you that I'm never trying to deceive. I can be wrong, but I don't want to lie. Lying is a sign of weakness. Lying means that you think that the truth is bad. I'm very much convinced that my ideology doesn't need lying about, because I base it on human value and human rights. How can that be bad for any human?

I don't think Trump is hated because he goes against the agendas of both parties, I think he's hated because he CHEATS and he disrespects all norms that America ever felt proud about. That hurts liberals and conservatives alike.

"Who do you think pays for the media?" The wealthy and corporations.
"This is a very corrupt country" You're catching on.
Your country literally legalized bribery.

Faith is based on telling yourself that something is true, on lacking evidence. If you had an abundance of evidence, you would need faith, because that's just reasoning. The first thing that should make you doubt faith is that almost everyone takes on the faith of people who surround them. Live in the US, you become a Christian, unless you grow up in a Jewish family or you make friends with Jewish people. There are rarely any Christians born in Nepal. There are no Jewish people born in China.

I'm not going to apologize for her. What do you want? I see her getting attacked from all sides, and she is biting back. There are no limits on the other side, so I don't put limits on her. It's apparently absolute free speech here, which means that discrimination and Antisemitism are allowed. I cannot find anything prohibiting it in the Terms of Use either. You're still here too, so you're allowed. It might be liberating, lets see where it goes.
If you don't like discrimination and Antisemitism, will you denounce people from your side of politics too, when they are being racist as fuck?

"You say there is no sense of decency anymore saying just because one person acts one way" No, many more than one.

This site can be anything to you that you want it to be.
If you care about empathy, you could probably stop this shit fight.
They will never listen to me, because I'm the enemy.

Do you want Iran to be in absolute chaos or do you want Iranian people to be free? What I see is the first as a goal. I don't agree with that. If Trump however succeeds in actually bringing stability, peace and freedom to Iran, I would want to bring him the Nobel Peace Prize myself. However, I see Trump hinting at nukes, and if he does that,
I hope there is a hell for him to burn in.

What I say is that in the fight between everyone attacking CAT and CAT attacking back, there are absolutely no standards of decency anymore and the line of racism has been crossed a long time ago.
I have no interest to be involved in shit fights without substance.
That's my position.

Are you criticizing Cat for changing her name? How long is your Limpy_Doodle account existing? You had another name before too. She never made a secret of who she was, or at least not to me.

This is the only account and the only name I ever had on this website, since 2013. I have posted 8 adult photos/videos, a very long time ago. There was no reason to fake them. You're not being serious to call those fakes. All the other uploads are a mix of things I ripped from the internet, images I made (maybe that's what you call 'fake') and some of my own non-nude non-portrait photos. That's because the website doesn't allow personal stuff anymore, unless you verify your identity.
I will never do that, because I don't trust your country with my identity.

It's not just words. He did attack Venezuela and Iran, and as we speak the
US Coast Guard is blocking oil tankers to Cuba, cutting off their energy supply.
Don't forget the tariffs.

Trump lies a lot and spreads a lot of nonsense, but when he promises aggression, you better don't dismiss it, because those promises he tends to keep.

Since when is it normal for you to say to not take your president seriously?
You just say that, without thinking: "How did we get here?"?

No, I don't engage with people shitting on each other, until it's about a topic that I care about. I only interact with you, because you talk politics. If you would only be in the shit throwing, I would ignore you and everyone throwing shit back.

Keep telling yourself that you are a class act, and at some point
you will believe yourself.

I think you are being humiliated by a boss, colleagues or family, and you take it because you have no courage in real life. You admitted that all your family is denouncing your political ideas. That's why you were looking for a safe space, to get your ideas validated. And then you found me. That sucks, I agree. There are indeed 50 members that think and feel the same way as you do, but you cannot handle that a few don't. That's pathetic.

I was very surprised to find so many right-wingers on a sex forum.
It is really not equivalent to real life. Even in the US, it's about 50/50.
It must be that you cannot vent your sexual fantasies in real life,
so they turn into frustration.

Summary: "Canada did not start the beef between your two countries, Trump did."
Being called the 51st state was not a joke to them, but a threat. And betrayal.
Do you find that difficult to understand?

OK, I found it, it's in that filth topic "Dog Bites from the PITBULL".
It's literally a topic dedicated to shitting on her.
If you join in, don't cry about getting shit on you too.

I'm not defending or downplaying anything, when I don't believe you.
You have no credibility. Your claim is worth 0 to me.

OK, found it. I'm not defending the 'Jew' comment.
Anything else is reaping what you sow.

You called me a "nazi-fucking-fag" as soon as 19 days ago.
Talk to someone who cares.

She said "shut your filthy mouth", so I can very safely assume that you were just as vile or worse, seeing my experience with you.

Again, since when is calling someone a 'Jew', worse than calling someone
a 'NAZI'?

"So don't you fucking tell me what to do.. You got it? "

You keep thinking that Jihadist terrorist and Muslims living in America have anything
in common. If they want to go to America, and they didn't do a suicide attack as soon as
they came in, then they are a very different type of Muslims.

Since when do we have the same standard for presidents as for actors?

She's calling YOU racist! How is that a racist remark?
It's definitely insulting, but not racist.

The only claim that I heard about CAT, is that she called someone a 'Jew'.
How is that worse than calling someone a NAZI?!?

Finally you said ONE thing that is true; you felt you were in a peaceful setting, in other words; you considered this a safe space for your political views. I understand that this can be annoying, for a SNOWFLAKE. When I started to talk about politics here, I found out that it was the most HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT that I could ever be in. Still, I didn't let that scare me off or make me stoop to expressing extreme personal attacks. I oppose ideas. I only respond personally to personal attacks.
You only think I am attacking you personally when I challenge your ideas, because you cannot separate your ideas from yourself. And then you respond more vitriolically than anyone else here.

You're not smart, because you are unable to justify anything.
You think that defining something is evidence for a claim. It's not.

It's not just well rehearsed. Everything that can be verified has been verified. That is impossible to manufacture if it's all a lie.

If there is no evidence, there is no case, but it was important enough for your FBI and DOJ to withhold the transcripts of her interview with the FBI, from 2019, against what the law orders them to do.

It's not just her, and it's not just transcripts from interviews from 2019. Trump is mentioned tens of thousands of times, in the small part of files that your FBI and DOJ DID RELEASE. It's said that the rest of the files, in underacted form, would add up to more than a million times that Trump is mentioned in:
- FBI investigation records & victim interview memos.
- Epstein’s emails and correspondence with associates.
- Press clippings and public materials collected by authorities.
- Flight logs, black books, and ancillary documents (metadata, property records).
- Database/index searches that include incidental mentions of his name.
After Epstein and Maxwell themselves, Trump appears most often in the Epstein files.
The vast majority of mentions of Donald Trump in the Epstein files come from documents dating LONG BEFORE he ran for president. Did they travel back in time?

Tell me why victims would point at Trump, and FBI would be investigating Trump, long before he had any significance? There are much wealthier and more powerful people
in the Epstein files, mentioned a FRACTION of the times that Trump is mentioned.

I repeat: If you are demanding to be allowed to say whatever the fuck you please,
than don't cry about what anyone else says, ever again.

It's not just Muslims who voted for her. She would have never won.
What is it that she hates about your country?
And doesn't she propose ideas that she believes improves your country?
Below are her main points for improving the US.
I see nothing about forcing women to be slaves to men, cutting off hands for stealing, Blasphemy laws or enforcing religion down people's throat. In fact, I see things like that much more from your side of politics.

I know what is in the koran, a lot better than you.

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:190 – “Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; Allah does not love transgressors.”

Surah At-Tawbah 9:5 (often called the “Verse of the Sword”) – “Then, when the sacred months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them, capture them, besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush…”

The same kind of horrible instructions are in the bible:

Deuteronomy 7:1–2: “When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations… you shall utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant with them and show them no mercy.”

1 Samuel 15:3: “Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

Joshua 6:21: “They devoted the city to the LORD and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it — men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.”

Deuteronomy 20:10–18 (NIV): “When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall serve you in forced labor and be subject to tribute. But if they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. When the LORD your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies. This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby. However, in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you must not leave alive anything that breathes. You shall completely destroy them — the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites — just as the LORD your God has commanded. Otherwise, they will teach you to follow all the detestable things they do in worshiping their gods, and you will sin against the LORD your God.

I would say that the violence and support of enslavement is much more in-your-face in the bible.

Just how there are lots of Christians who are 'good people', despite the instructions to do evil in their holy book, there are lots of Muslims who are 'good people', despite the instructions to do evil in their holy book. Ilhan Omar is one of them, so are our neighbors that we socialize with and have exchanged keys with. They are the most respectful, hospitable, trustworthy and grateful people that we know.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Economic Justice and Workers’ Rights
Advocates for Medicare for All to guarantee healthcare as a right.
Supports a living wage and stronger labor protections.
Promotes progressive taxation to reduce income inequality.

2. Education and Student Debt
Supports free or affordable college education.
Wants to eliminate or reduce student debt.
Advocates for investment in public schools and early childhood education.

3. Criminal Justice and Immigration Reform
Calls for ending mass incarceration and reforming policing.
Supports comprehensive immigration reform, including protecting DACA recipients and a pathway to citizenship.
Opposes family separation policies at the border.

4. Climate and Environmental Policy
Supports the Green New Deal to address climate change.
Promotes clean energy and environmental justice, particularly in underserved communities.

5. Foreign Policy and Human Rights
Advocates for a foreign policy based on human rights and diplomacy, not endless war.
Criticizes policies that she sees as harmful to marginalized populations abroad.

6. Equality and Social Justice
Strong advocate for racial, gender, and religious equity.
Focuses on combating systemic discrimination in housing, education, and employment.
Supports LGBTQ+ rights and protections for marginalized communities.

If you are demanding to be allowed to say whatever the fuck you please,
than don't cry about what anyone else says, ever again.

If you're grandparents were murdered in camps, don't support a president who is quoting Hitler, you fool. It's only your side who is talking about Hitler "doing good things too", like that would ever justify his evil. How many extreme right-wingers are saying that "Hitler was fucking cool", making a song called "Heil Hitler" or denying that the holocaust even happened? Only (or at least mostly) the side that you support!!!

There is now a new president in Chile; José Antonio Kast, marking the country’s most significant shift to the right in decades. His father was a German military officer who served in the Wehrmacht during World War II and was also a member of the Nazi Party.
José Antonio Kast mirrors Trump in style, rhetoric, and policy. He uses confrontational, outsider-focused messaging, courts controversy, and attacks institutional constraints like courts and independent agencies, echoing Trump’s assaults on checks and balances. Like Trump, he pushes strict immigration policies, promises a border wall, and appeals to nationalist and socially conservative voters, with polarizing rhetoric on security and identity.

No, because everything that you see, hear, feel and smell, would make you think that the earth is flat and doesn't move, the Sun moves around the Earth, the stars are holes in the sky-dome, gravity makes heavier objects fall faster, maggots just appear out of nothing in rotting meat, diseases come from “bad air”, the heart is where emotions happen, plants just sit there and don’t do much, smartphones 'magic' your voice to someone else, and earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes and lightning are a punishment for bad people.

I agree that it is easy for people to pull the wool over your eyes, but that's why science
is designed to be the most transparent process that we have. It's why experiments and observations are documented in a way that anyone with the right equipment should be able to reproduce it. It's why scientists constantly try to prove each other wrong, and when something is confirmed to be wrong, they will find a better explanation for the observations. It is a process of thousands of independent researchers trying to make a nice article about identifying anything incorrect in the article of another researcher. It's why scientific ideas must work in the real world; if they cannot be tested and verified, they are not accepted as science.

It's easy for a person to keep a secret, it's impossible for a group as large as all scientists, from all nations that are competing with each other, while everyone is allowed to check them, to keep a secret.

Imagine the logistics of a global conspiracy....
If your goal was to protect a global conspiracy, would you organize science the way
it’s organized today, with independent labs, everything published openly, peer review, attempts to disprove each other, and anyone able to learn and test it for themselves?

That was very funny.

I'm not ruling out that a consciousness is responsible for creating the universe.
It's just doesn't explain anything, because the existence of a consciousness with the power to create a universe is just as mysterious as a universe popping into existence
on its own (which is not what scientists are proposing).

Also, a consciousness creating the universe is not ruling out this way that life started.

The only thing that science shows is that Genesis in the Bible is very much inaccurate.
There are only three possibilities for why that story is that much flawed:
1) "God" had written it for complete numbskulls who don't understand anything and therefore need some fun story.
2) "God" did accurately explain how he farted out the universe and let physics and nature take its course, but word of mouth garbled it up and embellished it.
3) There is no "God" and primitive people made up a story to tell their kids, when they ask how everything came to be.

And so I do, when you're saying something non-vacuous.

Have you seen the interview of Kristen Welker with Donald Trump on Meet the Press
(May 4, 2025)?

Welker asks: “But even given those numbers that you're talking about, don't you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?”
Trump starts his answer with: “I don’t know.”

Whatever he says afterwards is irrelevant, because there is only ONE GOOD ANSWER: "Yes, the presidential oath explicitly commits the president to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.”"

I have seen the full context, I did the work, did you?

You couldn’t find your cojones I see.
Just find one thing that you can prove is false.
If everything I am saying and posting are lies, that should be easy.
I'll add one for you; if you can find a racist or antisemitic remark, you can stop too.
You got to post what it is, of course.

I would see it as a challenge.

Maybe phart wants to help.

OK, fine, that's an answer too. Saves me the wait.

I asked you one simple thing; will you justify or retract your discriminatory statements about Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib?

You have 24 hours to comply. Show that you are NOT a racist.
If not, I report you.

If you think that I'm a racist or anti-Semite, go ahead and report your case.
You have no leg to stand on.

Crucial Details Of Trump Accuser's Story CONFIRMED
only registered users can see external links

Everything that is verifiable about this woman's story has basically been verified.

Have some cojones and watch. You can stop if/when you can prove him a liar.

What If We Introduced Donald Trump Like a Potential Blind Date?
only registered users can see external links

Yes, because KNOWLEDGE can be used for good or evil.

FAITH can be used for good or evil.
MYTHS can be used for good or evil.
DOGMA can be used for good or evil.
NONSENSE can be used for good or evil.
EVEN LIES can be used for good or evil.

The question is; do you want to know what is TRUE, or NOT?

Is This How Life Started? New Evidence Changes Everything
only registered users can see external links