Page #4
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#74
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.Be honest!! 5.Is this about you š¤·āāļø, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Step 1: It begins with the myth of a glorious past, when our tribe was great
Step 2:This glorious past has been damaged by others who are not part of our tribe
Step 3: In order to reclaim our glorious past, we need to crush these other people
Step 4: The only one who can do this is our dear leader, aka fuhrer, aka DJT
Step 5: In order for our dear leader to do this, we must give absolute loyalty and fealty
Trump's āart of the dealā becomes laughing stock online after China tariffs climb down
š¤£š¤£š
the last line was
"Ultimately, whether Trump is a fascist depends on the criteria used. He exhibits some traits associated with fascist rhetoric but lacks the systematic implementation of a fascist state"
in other words, you can cherry pick any leader you don't like and find similaritys with facism or hitler or whoever.
hell you could compare biden to Jesus if you wanted to. they both walked on 2 legs,although biden was slow, they both required oxygen,and so on. but is biden Jesus? of course not.
i remember when bush was compared to hitler,obama, and others. anytime folks don't like a leader they find some way to compare them to the evil they are most associated with in their education
Bush is a literal War Criminal, and it's embarrassing that Obama didn't have him face consequences. That set the standard, for all presidents after to commit war crimes too,
although with varying levels of disregards for the law and human rights.
Trump is unique. Heās not a leader, heās an anomaly that could, accidentally, destroy a good part of the world with the USA being a good chunk of that.
I cannot see into their brain to find out their intent.
I can only see their actions, to know their morality.
I don't agree that ALL governments are amoral.
In any case, I don't want them to be amoral.
I'm voting for people who show a long record of good morals.
The FIRST SIGN when they aren't, is when they are DISHONEST.
I want my representatives to tell the truth, ESPECIALLY when that's difficult.
If you make honesty your litmus test, the only challenge you have then
is understanding what's true and how to recognize lies. That's what I have been focusing my knowledge and experience on, for the last 20 years.
The foundation of good morals is a mix of reason, empathy, and the pursuit of human flourishing. Reason helps us figure out whatās fair and consistent, like the Golden Ruleātreat others as youād want to be treated. Empathy lets us feel the impact of our actions on others, grounding morality in shared humanity. The goal is to create a world where people can live well together, balancing individual freedom with collective responsibility. Different cultures and philosophies (like Aristotleās virtue ethics or Kantās duty-based approach) flesh this out, but it boils down to principles that promote trust, cooperation, and minimizing harm. No single sourceāreligion, tradition, or scienceāhas a monopoly on it; they all contribute perspectives, but critical thinking sifts the best from them.
so even ai acknowledges religion provides perspective in moral. so how can you fully understand and expect moral and be a atheist?
I do not base morality on just honesty, I just make it a litmus test for politicians. That's because a politician's only job is representing their constituents. If they are dishonest, they are USELESS to do that job. If they think they need to lie, they either don't believe that they are representing their constituents, or they don't believe in the principles that they are representing. Both is a problem. Why would I vote for that?
What part of what Grok said to you makes you think that atheists can't be moral?
And how do you become moral from being a believer? When Muslims blow themselves up to kill infidels, they are doing what they believe in, with all their harts. Is that then a moral act to you?
Now, going back to my premise, any government of any country would carry out an assassination if it meant their country would be spared great harm. That is amoral. The people in that government may be very moral. A case in point would be President Truman. He ordered the deaths of thousands of Japanese people by bombing two cities with nuclear weapons. Was it the right call? For my part I have to say yes. Do I like it? No, and no one with a single fiber of morality would either, but there it is.
Recognizing the truth is a lot harder than it sounds and humanity has never been totally truthful nor will it ever be.
is an amoral act. Real self defense is not amoral. War is not amoral by definition.
When both the intent and the result are serving the right causes,
that's being moral. The problem is that you don't know, when they are lying.
I don't think the atom bombs on Japan were a moral act, because I think there were alternatives. They could have threatened Japan that they would do it, with the same effect. I am not even convinced that they believed it was necessary to end the war,
I think it was power play. Even if the end result might have prevented nuclear war,
I think the intent of it was to show the world who is the boss, which makes it an amoral act. I agree that sometimes an amoral act is required to prevent a horrible future, but since we don't know the future, the baseline should be to be the most moral possible. The baseline that I see is to be amoral way too much and use prevention of horrible events as a justification. That doesn't cut it, that's lying to yourself, that your actions are "good" by definition, because your intent is "good".
I don't believe that, when they are lying too much. You don't need to lie, when your intent is "good", because than you can explain your actions.
Be careful though, being honest doesn't guarantee morality. There are lots of people who are being open about their horrific acts these days. They could be completely honest about that, without it making the acts or their intent moral. It only works 1 way.
There is such a thing as a "white lie", but it's a very tricky area to be in.
I agree that recognizing truth is hard, but in your politics it isn't.
Trump is lying so much, because he's trying to destroy truth itself.
That for me would be a reason to never vote for him, even if he promised
to do everything I would like. Of course his promises were horrible by itself,
but when a politician feels the need to lie that much, you cannot trust any of
the promises either. You would have no idea what you are voting for.
What I'm supporting is to STOP ELECTING ASS-HOLES.
They never make your life any better, because they don't care to.
They don't care about you, or the country or the world, only about themselves.
That's what you need decent people for: they WANT to make things better.
However, you voted in the biggest ass-hole in American history, so you don't get it.
Hopefully you'll learn something, when it turns into a big disaster AGAIN.
is an amoral act" johnson used our government to wipe out kennedy so he could run the country
Second: "so he could run the country" is not the same as "When a government
is actually convinced they are preventing great harm and in reality actually preventing great harm, with an assassination...".
You still haven't explained how what I said makes that "good".
I think we have different ideas on what being 'convinced' of something should be.
People lie to themselves too much, because they WANT to believe something.
That's a religion, or a bias, or justifying your selfish reasons to yourself.
I don't want a government to do that. I want my elected representatives to reject their own self-interests and make decisions on ethics and logical reasoning.
I want them to represent my values and convince the most possible people
of them. I don't want them to lie, cheat, break laws and/or behave repulsively,
to achieve my goals, because that reflects badly ON ME.
It's also bad strategy, because most people don't like liars, cheaters,
law-breakers or repulsive behavior. If you need it, it makes you the "bad guy".
it was afraid it would get stuck in a crack
only registered users can see external links
"It's difficult to provide an exact number of U.S. presidents who have been compared to Adolf Hitler, as such comparisons are often subjective, rhetorical, or made in varied contexts (e.g., political discourse, media, or public opinion). However, based on available information, many U.S. presidents, especially since World War II, have faced such comparisons from political opponents, critics, or commentators, often as a hyperbolic way to express disagreement or highlight perceived authoritarian tendencies. The sources suggest the following:
General Trend: Comparisons to Hitler are common in modern political rhetoric, particularly for controversial or polarizing figures. This is noted as a recurring tactic used by critics across party lines, with Hitler serving as a "benchmark of worstness" for leaders deemed objectionable.
Specific Presidents: While not exhaustive, references exist for several presidents being likened to Hitler, including:
John F. Kennedy: Criticized over the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Lyndon B. Johnson: Compared to Hitler by the President of Yugoslavia for bombing Vietnam.Richard Nixon: Faced such comparisons, though specific reasons are less detailed.Donald Trump: Frequently compared to Hitler, with parallels drawn to his rhetoric, attempts to challenge election results, and polarizing style.Other Republican Presidents: Sources note that Democrats have often compared Republican presidents like Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, and others to Hitler as a rhetorical attack, though specifics vary.Historical Context: The comparison is not limited to post-WWII presidents. Even earlier presidents like Herbert Hoover, who met Hitler in 1938, were scrutinized in ways that could invite comparisons, though less explicitly.Estimate: Given that 46 men have served as U.S. presidents (across 47 presidencies, accounting for Grover Cleveland and Donald Trump's non-consecutive terms) and the noted frequency of such comparisons, itās plausible that at least a dozen or more presidents have been compared to Hitler at some point, especially in the modern era. However, precise documentation for every instance is lacking, and not all comparisons are equally substantive (some are fleeting or hyperbolic).
Caveat: Many comparisons are rhetorical exaggerations rather than serious historical analyses, and their validity varies widely. Without comprehensive data on every president, the number remains an estimate based on the pattern described in the sources. For a definitive count, further research into primary sources or political rhetoric for each presidency would be needed.
Much of it is hyperbolic, even while most of your presidents in the last decades are
War Criminals by international law standards. Then of course your side things anything that uses government money to help normal Americans is "socialism", "communism", "Marxism" and "fascism", even though those terms are contradictory. You are used to
your side being ridiculously hyperbolic, so when the other side does it, you just accuse them of what you are doing, all the time.
The difference is that Trump's ideology, and many of his actions, actually apply to all the definitions of "fascism". The large majority of experts studying the history of fascism agree with that assessment.
Jason Stanley, a Yale University philosophy professor and renowned expert on fascism announced his decision to leave the United States for Canada, in early 2025, citing deep concerns over what he perceives as the U.S. government's slide toward fascism under Donald Trump.
Understand that it doesn't require acting like Hitler or Mussolini, to completely deserve the label of "fascist". If your ideology completely meets the criteria of the definition of "fascist", it's accurate to call you a "fascist".
Trump has proceeded much further than just showing an ideology that deserves the label of "fascist". Even in his first term, he used consistent lying as a strategy to destroy truth,
he attacked minorities as a scapegoat for a failing country, he disrespected the law like
no other president before him, he attacked the media constantly, he constantly berated modern liberal democratic countries while cozying up to the worst dictatorships in the world, he increased the inequality in your already very crony capitalistic economy, deregulated the law for powerful people and toughening laws for normal people, and refused to accept his democratic defeat, while conspiring against the will of the people.
Before his second term, he had his loyalists in the Supreme Court give him immunity from legal repercussion, for committing crimes. He wanted full immunity, but the Supreme Court limited it slightly. As soon as he was elected president, with the help of the wealthiest man in the world, Elon Musk, literally buying votes for him, he let that wealthiest man go through all the government and private finances of your people, while being in-transparent, unaccountable and disregarding any safety standards to protect this vital data from foreign theft, without clearance, without democratic oversight. Elon Musk is canceling agencies,
in direct contradiction with Constitutional responsibility of Congress. Several judges order this infringement on the government to stop immediately, but because the Trump regime has taken control of the FBI, this clear violation of several laws goes unstopped and unpunished. This is an unprecedented level of criminal enterprise, within the US government.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk is giving a Nazi salute TWICE, for all the world to see. Trump himself is emboldening his support for the war crimes against the Palestinian people, by the Netanyahu regime of Israel, which itself is holding on to power after being charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust. Trump is literally talking about ethnic cleansing of Gaza, while supporting the starvation of the Palestinians, while the historically largest number of journalists are killed by bombs and shells supplied by the US.
Then Trump starts kidnapping people from American soil and human trafficking them to prison camps, with a reputation for beating people to death, in a dictatorship, which historically and currently is recognized as the OG ābanana republicā, on just accusations of being illegal or a gang member, without proving it in court, while the facts show those accusations to be false in many cases and the courts rule that this should stop and even the Supreme Court rules that people have been illegally and unjustly deported.
If that doesn't meet your definition of "fascism", than provide your definition of "fascism" and argument what part of it doesn't fit it.
I use the term "fascist" for Trump, because it fits. It's not hyperbolic at all. I use the term "Nazi" less for Trump, because it's a less accurately defined term, which fits less.
However, I call Elon Musk a Nazi without restraint, because he gave the Nazi Salute twice and comes from a family with a long history of Nazi and South African Apartheid support.
I don't think I ever called Trump "Hitler", but his own Vice President called him "Hitler",
which Trump didn't seem to mind, so why would you even complain about any of this?
only registered users can see external links
"The most common problems shipping companies have encountered are reduced shipping demand, lower freight rates, and rising costs of labor, fuel, and insurance."
labor and fuel, and these issues were before Trump came into office, it is just april and these companys are throwing the towel because of past years lack of profit.
who says biden did good? not the real world folks
If they had confidence that Trump's ideas would be good for them, why would they stop?
Aging workforce:
A significant portion of the current driver pool is nearing retirement, with fewer young people entering the profession.
High turnover:
Difficult working conditions, including long hours, stress, and limited work-life balance, contribute to high driver turnover.
Attracting new drivers:
The trucking industry needs to make itself more attractive to younger generations by offering better compensation, improved working conditions, and more flexible options.
2. Rising Operational Costs:
Fuel costs:
Diesel fuel prices fluctuate significantly, and rising prices can drastically impact a company's bottom line.
Insurance costs:
Insurance premiums have been on the rise, adding another layer of expense for trucking companies.
Other operational costs:
Tire costs, maintenance, and repairs, especially for older trucks, are also increasing.
3. Deregulation and Market Volatility:
Competitive rates:
The deregulation of freight rates in the 1980s led to increased competition and a tendency for trucking companies to bid down rates, making it difficult to be profitable.
Overcapacity:
There are more trucks on the road than there are loads to haul, leading to lower rates and a struggle for some companies to stay afloat.
Economic cycles:
The trucking industry is susceptible to economic downturns, with periods of low demand for freight leading to financial strain for many companies.
4. Other Challenges:
Truck Parking Shortage:
Insufficient parking for long-haul truck drivers can lead to violations of hours of service limits and safety concerns, according to Trucker Tools.
Regulatory Compliance:
The trucking industry is subject to various regulations regarding safety, emissions, and other operational aspects, which can be complex and costly to comply with.
Technology Disruptions:
While technological advancements like autonomous vehicles promise to improve efficiency, the transition to these new technologies can be disruptive and costly for trucking companies.
Look it up, Phart, and, while we are at it, didnāt the Clown say everything would be fixed on the SECOND day of his administration?
and until you fix the issue of soccer moms cutting in front of them and etc, you can fix the conditions outside the truck. and if you raise the pay alot more, the goods they are hauling will cost even more.
sure it is stressful, name a good paying job that allows you to see the country that is'nt.
Cat .it is no ones fault that moving goods requires humans to do it at this time,but Elon,and others you hate, are working on fixing the problem by automating trucks to do the work with less or no human involvement. that is the great thing about tech, it will help eliminate these complaints and the high labor cost. the automation has cost so we the consumer won't see a remarkable savings in the long term but at least people won't be bitching about having to drive.
Americans are getting to be the most pussyfied,lazy,over bearing people on earth. suck it up and go to work and keep America moving or sit still and shut up
why would they stop?
No company just stops, when they see profit in the future.
So again, why don't they believe in what Trump is doing?
What he's doing is supposed to be good for your economy, right?
No matter how high the price of fuel or the price of labor, transportation is still needed. "America First" should be the absolute best prospect for a trucking company, because it increases INTERNAL manufacturing and consumption,
which is all transported by trucks in the US, because your rail-system sucks,
while global trade requires ships and planes. They should feel very optimistic
about the future. Even if they would have been on the verge of bankruptcy,
they would hold on for dear life, if the future looks promising.
NO AMERICAN would say no to future profit guarantees.
There is only one explanation; they see hard times coming, from Trump's actions.
The reality is that they are correct. Trump is destroying your economy.
only registered users can see external links
i can't wait myself,looking forward to being able to do bussiness without having to deal with snot nose brats that are to lazy to work
Then, WTF, are those brats doing work dealing with you doing business? Which is it? Not working or working? And if you think you have it hard, think it from their point of view. āOh, crap. Here comes that crippled old fart. Bet his first words are, āyou are all lazyā.
grok is actually interesting if you mess with it a while
only registered users can see external links
and i couldn't help but notice 1 of the peoples names, Vietnamese Duh Hung Nguyen
only registered users can see external links
Really>? this is downright silly
IF they gave a damn, they would stop the drugs from coming into their own borders don't you think??
So yes, we will go into a ression because of canada and mexico's failure to comply with Trumps demands of stopping the drugs and stopping the killing of Americans. It is no different than if a canadian sat at the border and shot 4 people a day with a rifle. would you permit that? Probably if it made your lumber and oil cheaper right?
--------------------------------------- added after 46 seconds
Mexico did everything the Clown wanted, so?
how i make it work? i buy second hand everything i can. i rebuild or build from scratch anything i need mechanical.
self reliance is key to reducing foreign influence.
sadly some tooling i have bought recently is made overseas. tried for 3 years to find a second hand set of tool boxes and couldn't find anything that would function for me.
kids don't get a chance to learn at a early age.
I do agree that high school should split the students into two or three different paths such as trade or vocational school, scientific school, and clerical. The choice being given to the student.
only registered users can see external links
Notably, on December 24, 2024, CBSA officers at the Coutts border crossing in Alberta discovered 186 kilograms of methamphetamine, valued at approximately $1.86 million CAD. Three weeks later, on January 18, 2025, they seized an additional 42 kilograms of cocaine, worth over $1 million CAD.
only registered users can see external links
These efforts highlight the CBSA's commitment to preventing the flow of illicit drugs into Canada from the United States.
Which country is overflowing which country with illegal drugs again?
only registered users can see external links
That, though, was not the topic we are discussing. We are discussing the tariffs illegally applied to incoming goods from our neighboring countries of Mexico and Canada. The Clown is using false data to justify his dumb logic that a tariff will stop either country from exporting fentanyl to the United States. And, if heās right, and heās not, then why does he go back and forth imposing the tariffs and then stopping them. And why should I or any American have to pay for this through higher prices on goods?
Stop defending Donnie Boyās insane tariff policies. Heās going to get us in a recession or worse and drag the rest of the world into it too.
Bidenās economy was doing good. Maybe inflation was a little high, but, nowhere what it is now. And it looks like itās going to get worse. A lot worse.
But I argue the point of it being life or death. Sure, the withdrawl sucks , just 2 patches of it were enough for me to go into all kinds of shit for several days after I took that second 1 off. BUT it can be done. some people are just incapable of withstanding a bit of pain without looking for a crutch.
It's not intended for people with "a bit of pain", it's for people who are suffering.
It's the next best thing after Morphine. There are just many people suffering
in your country, because your healthcare system sucks.
The lower income people hardly have any healthcare at all.
Even if you have a good job that offers good health coverage,
you still are paying more, than I would, if I didn't have any.
Total costs for a healthy pregnancy, delivery and insurance, on Platinum insurance in the US is $6,460. In The Netherlands, the national maximum rate for an outpatient delivery without a medical indication or a delivery in a birthing center is ā¬841.51 ($917.03). There might be some extra costs involved in your rate, but your $6,460 is after Platinum insurance, our $917.03 is before any insurance.
Our BASIC insurance covers the care for the mother and all her baby's needs, before, during and after birth. That's because your government allows the hospitals, pharma companies and insurance companies to get rich, by screwing patients and everyone on insurance. That money is mostly going to shareholders, not to the development of better healthcare. People like Vivek Ramaswamy get rich by leeching of that system. Then they go into politics to screw you even more.
Only the really wealthy people have your top quality healthcare,
for everyone else, even if they can afford it, it's worse than ours.
More women and children die during your $6,460 'Platinum' births,
than during our fully paid for 'basic' births.
That might be something to consider, if you're worried about low birth rates.
How many immigrants do your oligarchs need to replace your not born workers?
How many people can afford Platinum insurance and how many people can afford $6,460, when they want a kid? Aren't kids not already expensive enough?
If you want them to look out for you when you're old, you need to invest in their education, because they're not much use to you, when they turn out poor.
but as soon as he started actually doing stuff, the stock market started to tank.
The idea that Republicans are good for the economy is nothing but a myth.
And the idea that Republicans ever lower the debt & deficit is a complete lie.
In any case, it's time to hold Trump accountable to his own standards:
March 10, 2025: Dow Jones Index Open: 42,507.65
March 11, 2025: Dow Jones Index Close: 41,433.48
Difference over 2 days: -1,074.17 points
Time to impeach the president!
it's up to the people to remove him.
The midterm elections of ALL the House of Representatives and one third of the Senate in November 2026 will determine what party controls Congress starting on January 1, 2027. Itās not a given that Democrats will pull it off. If they do, theyāll be able to push back somewhat.
Democrats are showing NO leadership at all. They are capitulating.
They are losing even more support than Republicans right now.
No one will vote for pathetic losers. If there is even a fair election.
You will have only Constitutional protection left; the 2nd amendment.
MAGA would be willing to start civil war, to destroy America.
It's time that your side shows that saving America is worth it too.
that leader will never be able to do something good for the working class.
That's why Bernie Sanders is now not talking about who should lead the Democrats, but about rebuilding the party from the ground up. All the other representatives are much more important. They will support actual progressives, while all the billionaires will donate millions to the corrupt corporatists. The likes who just voted with Republicans for Trumps spending bill, that cuts everything
for you and gives massive hand-outs to the wealthy.
That "new blood" is exactly what Bernie and AOC were talking about.
Watch this video from 3:53:
only registered users can see external links
Itās going to take awhile to fix all the Democrats fuck ups
Was investing in infrastructure a fuck up?
Was paying off some of the worst student debt a fuck up?
The idea being that he increased the debt and the deficit, right?
Trump did, and will again, increase the debt and the deficit, MUCH MORE!!!
And YOU will be paying MORE TAXES to fix his fuck-ups again.
How about the way joe Biden pulled us out of Afghanistan people falling to their death from the air plane wings how about letting billions of dollars worth of military equipment with the keys hanging in them now being used as terrorist tools those are just a couple of the democrats fuck ups i was thinking of so donāt try to predict what Iām thinking itās a dangerous game
Can you explain the cause and effect you're thinking about?
Heating Oil down 30 cents per gallon
Milk down 50 cents per gallon
Eggs down 2 dollars per dozen
Itās not much but itās a start
It saves me 10 dollars per week
Biden managed to get your economy running at top speed, put people
back to work, and invested in jobs coming back to America.
That's exactly what you say you want.
Before Biden, Trump massively increased the debt and the deficit.
That's exactly what you say you DON'T want.
If you blame Biden for inflation, that's because he prioritized what YOU wanted him to do, instead of making the economy benefit ALL Americans.
Biden was TOO RIGHT-WING. He should have increased the minimum wage
for all the working class. That wouldn't have overheated the economy, and made it easier for the working class to pay for groceries. You are blaming Biden for not being LEFT-WING ENOUGH, while you have voted for Elon taking the last dollar out of the hands of the working class.
The only thing you came up with was Afghanistan, so far.
Is that what you think left the US in such a rough shape?
The Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts costed somewhere between $4 to $6 trillion.
What did you get out of that? Is terrorism defeated now?
At least Obama killed Osama Bin Laden. In Pakistan.
What did Biden do, to make life for the working class worse,
so they couldn't afford groceries?
No answer at all... Crickets!!!
I say; not raising their minimum wage. Your answer; Bull shit
That's you, knowing that I AM RIGHT!
"such a rough shape".
Mostly because it's not true. Both presidents left your country in a much better shape than they got it in, while the Republican president before them did the exact opposite.
My claim is supported by ALL statistics. You're just saying that the US FELT in better shape, because people could more easily afford groceries.
You don't present any evidence or provide any logical relationship to what Obama or Biden did, to make groceries more expensive.
Everything has become more expensive. That is because of capitalism.
The rich are becoming more rich, and everyone else is getting poorer.
You keep voting in the people who are making that worse.
Poor children that got to eat in school, now don't get it anymore.
Elon cut the funding for that. How clear do you want it?
At least he did pull you out of Afghanistan. Trump could have done that, but didn't, probably because he knew it would be messy. At least 90 more American soldiers died,
because Trump left them there.
If you're worried about the Taliban, stop supporting Saudi Arabia, their biggest supporters. Saudi Arabia got a $200 billion weapons deal from Trump. And you care about some broken helicopters and jeeps? Do I need to remind you that 15 of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia?
Better pay attention to what Trump is doing, because he's thinking about starting wars everywhere. They are hinting at Iran every day. That will be much worse than Afghanistan. Or do you want something to cry about, when a Democrat pulls you out, after you spent 10 trillion dollars and wasted the lives of tens of thousands of American soldiers, for something completely useless? There is nothing to gain from war with Iran.
Anything else?
only registered users can see external links
But it's more that 3 billion too. Just one deal was already $8.1 billion, and I didn't read that one wrong.
only registered users can see external links
"It includes some of the worldās most sophisticated warfare aircraft, including precision-guided bombs, advanced F-15 fighter jets and laser-guided missiles."
Republicans were lying through their teeth about what was really left behind in Afghanistan.
only registered users can see external links
That's not much of a difference with Saudi Arabia.
Sunni jihadists vs Sunni fundamentalists who support Sunni jihadists.
The only difference is that one group of extremist lunatics actually controls
a whole country with a military. And you are choosing to strengthen them,
just because they control oil. Never learn from history!
That's why it's not a good idea to let someone like that run a country.
It requires more wisdom than just what makes you money, short term.
New Comment Go to top