SITO Court Members
Plaintiffs,

v

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

.......................COMPLAINT...........................

COUNT I. FILTERING A PROFILE PICTURE

1. The defendant, CAT52! has posted a picture that she has filtered(see pictures below) as Exhibit 'A" presented by member, Sir-Skittles.

2. She has used this picture on the front page of the site.

3. She wants the members of this site to think she looks younger than she does.

4. The evidence is very clear; she is fat, old, with
wrinkles.

COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. The defendant has plagiarized member Sir-Skittles blogs. This is a violation of the laws of plagiarism.

2. The defendant has plagiarized all blogs of member Sir-Skittles.

3. She wrote the following, plagiarized this blog; Skittles at Bronx hospital.


Judge RuFino: Ms. CAT52! Stop plagiarizing other members' blogs. You are not very intelligent at all when you copy someone's blogs. Regarding your picture, stop using fake pictures of yourself. You are old, and you should be happy the way you are supposed to look: fat and wrinkly. You are guilty of the above charges with 20 days' probation. 3/17/26

The Cat cunt has plagiarism charges pending-

She has stolen another one my blogs- She has not an original thought in her feeble brain. It was damaged at birth when she got stuck in her mom's cunt- '

Charlie giving her domestic violence every holiday with a crack to the head has not helped either. An imbecile and mongoloid.

More charges for this old lump- Posting heavily filtered pictures- Look at those old ass teeth! Yuck!


--------------------------------------- added after 311 hours



The actual, unfiltered pic!

Judge Florisbinda: This Court has charged the defendant CAT52! with the following: Suppression of free speech and attacking the Court Judges.


SITO members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

...................COMPLAINT............................

COUNT I. SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH

1. The defendant, CAT52, a member of this site, has a forum on this site site. Stuff III.

2. On her forum members are allowed to leave comments of any kind, including pictures.

3. The defendant has deleted opinions on her forum because she doesn't like other members' statements or opinions.

4. It is the right of each member to have an opinion and not be deleted because the author of that forum does not like it.


COUNT II. ATTACKING the COURT ( Contempt of Court)

1. This defendant has sent threats to this COurt.

2. The defendant has disrupted this Court's judges' hearings

3. CAT52! has sent attacks in the form of plagiarism.


Judge Florisbinda: Ms. CAT52! you are disgrace of this site.
If you feel you are getting attacks on your forums, this Court suggests not to write any. A member should be able to accept opinions from other members, 3even if you disagree wit them. Once you delete members' statements from your forum is a complete aggression to free speech. I found you guilty of the above charges.

Chief Justice RuFino: Ms. CAT52! you have been charged with a serious charge; Sedition. This Court in consideration to other members have rejected your conduct on this site. This Court is not amused about your scandalous conduct on this site.

SITO MEMBERS,
PLAINTIFFS,

V

CAT52!
DEFENDANT.

,,..............
Case Complaint

1. The defendant has file unreasonable complaints to the Administration of this site.

2. The defendant has attacked several members of this site.

3. The defendant has blacklisted several members of this site. At the time of this hearing defendant unblocked all of them.

4. The defendant posted pictures of herself of more than 20 years. Most recently she posted in the front an altered picture based on the evidence of members Mongo and Sir-Skittles.

5. The defendant has shown racist and homophobic conduct against other members.

6. The defendant has several times has destroyed case evidence.

7. The defendant have committed bribery.

8. The defendant belongs to the KKK and Nazi groups. No members should be allowed in this site with this type of ideology.

9. The defendant support ****philes.

10. The defendant has neglected her duties as a mother.

11. The defendant created several fake profiles with the intention to attack other members.

This Court on this day 8th of March 2026 finds this defendant guilty of Sedition. She is now deemed by this Court a personna non grata.

All judges of this Court affirm this judgment.

Clerk of the Court: This hearing to decide if member CAT52! should be charged with Attacking the Court.

Judge Rufino (Chief Justice), This Court, based on the evidence, shows she attacked the site Court 5 days ago. She used promotions on this site to attack and defame this Court.
She is guilty of the above charges.

Justice Florisbinda: "This Court will not tolerate your outrageous behavior against this Court. I found you guilty of the above charges."

Justice Clarisbinda. "This Court questions your level of intelligence. Based on your behaviour, you have acted like a young teenager. You have also involved other members of the Court in these attacks. I found you guilty of the above charges.

February 27. 2026

Clerk of the Court: This Court will be charging member CAT52! with 2 counts of Obstruction of free speech.


SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
________________________/

.........................COMPLAINT......................


This Court declares all the statements in this complaint are true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. OBSTRUCTION OF SPEECH(Sir-Skittles)

1. The evidence shows the defendant, CAT52!, has deleted comments of member Sir-Skittles in the defendant's site forums.

2. The defendant deleted statements made by the plaintiff.

3. Others shall not obstruct the right to make comments and submit pictures because of differences of opinion.


COUNT II. OBSTRUCTION OF SPEECH (Mongo)

1. The evidence shows the defendant, CAT52! deleted comments by member Mongo in her forum.

2. The plaintiff made some statements in the defendant's forum.

3. Others shall not obstruct the right to make comments regardless of the difference in opinions.

JUDGE RuFino Judgement: Ms. CAT52! You don't have the right to delete members' opinions and statements from your forums.
Every member has the right to free speech in any forums on this site. Does 2 members delete from their own forum when you post comments in their forums? No they are not. Only you with the mentality of a child will do something like that. You shall not have any forums or blogs in this site if comments from other members you dislike. When you are going to stop this nonsense. This Court find you guilty of the above charges. In addition this Court find you mentally incompetent in writing forums and blogs.


February 22, 2026

SITO Members,
Sir-Skittles, plaintiffs.

v.

CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny
defendant.
_____________________________/

...................COMPLAINT...........................

This Court declares all the statements in this case to be true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The evidence shows the defendant attacked member Sir-Skittles.

2. Member Sir-Skittles is a site immunity member. Under the Immunity Act, no other member is allowed to defame or attack him on her forum or blogs here. In addition to blacklisting the said member.

3. The defendant violated the Immunity Member Act on several occasions.


COUNT II. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. The defendant CAT52! has posted and continues to post pictures of her of more than 20 years ago.

2. The evidence shows the defendant has posted these pictures on the site's front page.

3. Under the rules of this Court, members must post recent pictures and not obsolete ones as the defendant did.

JUDGE FREDESBINDA: Ms. CAT52! You keep posting pictures of you of more than 20 years ago. That's outrageous, and this Court orders you to delete those pictures immediately.

February 19, 2026

More charges for that lump of shit cat52!

Banning a premium member without cause!

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
_______________/

......................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.


COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. The defendant in this case, CAT52! has posted pictures for more than 10 years.

2. Defendant has posted these pictures on the front page of the site.

3. The defendant has used Photoshop to enhance the photographs to look younger and without a wrinkle body.


JUDGE Florisbinda: Ms. CAT52! Stop posting pictures that are not you. You want to be a 30-year-old woman. You are now in your late 70s and no longer the same body as you were years ago. If you are no longer the same as years ago, don't post obsolete pictures. You are lying to members of this site, especially men. I order you to delete these pictures immediately from the front page.

January 23, 2026

SITO Court case of CAT52!


SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
Defendant.
_________________/
.................COMPLAINT................................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURE(S)

1. The defendant has violated the rules of this Court and site when she posted a picture more than 20 years ago.

2. The defendant has posted a picture of her naked body on the front page of the site with the intent to gain more visitors to her page.

3. The defendant's picture is from July 1990. The picture was taken 35 years ago.


JUDGE RuFino: Ms. CAT52! It's time to take down that picture. You are deceiving members of this site by posting this picture that is not actually the way you look today. You have 20 days to take down that picture of face contempt of Court charges.

Sir-Skittles,
SITO Members
Plaintiffs,


V>

CAT52!
Defendant

.........................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant CAT52! destroyed case evidence regarding member tecsan's case.

2. The defendant on Monday 15 of December destroyed case evidence in this Court's upcoming case.

3. Defendant tecsan's page was full of negative gifts. The defendant in this case CAT52! use good gifts to destroy all negative gifts.

4. The defendant violated Rule #500 sec 2A: No member is allowed to destroy evidence on a pending case of another member.


COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. December 17, the defendant wrote a blog called "Heading to the off brand mall"

2. The above blog is an exact copy of member Sir-Skittles, call: "A Very Saggy Granny Christmas Special part 7."

3. The defendant changed the names of the characters in the original and used members' names, PITBULL and Sir-Skittles as her own blog.


Judge RuFino. Ms CAT52! you have committed some serious offenses. I order you to delete your plagiarized blog immediately. Do not use other members' blogs as your own blog. You are basically stealing the words of others here, and this is not acceptable. I don't know why you are plagiarizing member Sir-Skittles' blog. Apparently, you don't have the creativity to write your own blogs. I found you guilty of the above charges. You have 20 days to delete that blog.

December 19, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
_________________/

...................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the case evidence.


COUNT I. VIOLATION Tecsan SPAM ACT RULE

1. The defendant CAT52! violated the tecsan Spam Rule.

2. On a case law member tecsan spam all blogs on this site.

3. The defendant CAT52! spam the following forums of members Sir-Skittles and PITBULL, flooding their forums

COUNT II. ATTACKING A PREMIUM MEMBER

1. It's a violation of the Court rules to attack, harass and defame a member.

2. The defendant violated the above rules when she attacked member Sir-Skittles on this site.

COUNT III. OBSTRUCTION OF FREE SPEECH

1/. The defendant violated the free speech rights of members Mongo and Pitbull.

2. The defendant obstructed the right of the above members when they were trying to comment on the defendant's forums.

3. For 5 days, the defendant blocked and banned the above members' right of free speech.

COUNT IV. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. Defendant has been posting obsolete pictures on the front page and Best Member/Image

2. Defendant posted the first picture on the front page. The picture is from the 1990s. She intentionally posted this picture, knowing it was from those years.

3. Defendant's page on the Best Member/Image is from the 2000s.


JUDGE Fredesbinda: Ms. CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charges. I order you to delete these pictures. In addition, I order you to clean members' Sir-Skittles and PITBULL forums.
You are not a good member of this site. You attack members, and you don't care. You are a woman full of hate.

December 10. 2025

Clerk of the Court: The Court will dismiss the charges of RACIST CONDUCT against the defendant CAT52! without prejudice.


SITO Members,
Plaintiffs


v.


CAT52!
Defendant
.............................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court will show, based on the evidence of this case, that the defendant committed these actions:

COUNT I. SPONSORING A SEXUAL PREDATOR

1. The defendant's husband Charlie a/k/a Woody, was convicted of sex charges in the state of Florida.

2. This Court ordered the defendant's husband to delete his profile. Woody complied with this Court order

3. The defendant CAT52! has pictures of her husband on her profile page. This is a Violation of the Court rules, sponsoring or promoting a convicted felon.

JUDGE RuFino Final Judgement: Ms. CAT52! This Court ordered you to remove all pictures of your convicted husband. You have 20 days to remove any images, blogs, and other means of communication using his profile. Those are not acceptable anymore since he is no longer a member of this site. You are outrageously posting pictures of him, a convicted sexual predator.

December 4, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
_________________/

......................COMPLAINT..........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE PICTURE

1. The defendant has posted a fake picture on the front page of this site.

2. The picture in question is from 1995. The picture does not accurately represent the defendant's actual appearance.

3. The defendant altered the picture using an application called RETAKE.


COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant, CAT52! destroyed case evidence of member bjuk.

2. The defendant posted gifts and deleted negative gifts. This is basically witness tampering.


JUDGE FREDESBINDA: Ms. CAT52, I have found you guilty of the charges listed above. You will now be on probation for 30 days.

November 8, 2025