SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/

////////////////////COMPLAINT///////////////////////

This Cout declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.

COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE LINK IN THE CHAT ROOM

1. On May 12 , the defendant posted a fake link in the chat room.

2. It is prohibited to post fake links in chat rooms with the intent to defraud members. The link was not clear, appearing blurry or did not exist.

3. Members asked the defendant what type of link was but he refused to say.

4. The link damages the configuration of the chat room.

Judge RuFino: Mjr. GingerDaddy if you continue posting fake links, this Court will suspend all your chat room privileges immediately. Stop acting like a child.

May 13, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs

vs.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

.....................COMPLAINT.....................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.

COUNT I . POSTING A FAKE PICTURE(S)

1. The defendant CAT52! has violated rule 113, which states, "No Member shall post fake pictures as part of their profile."

2. The defendant posted a fake picture in the; Best Image/Top Member section. The picture got low ratings after member PITBULL mentioned in the blog section.

3. The defendant posted the fake picture to get more members to her profile page.


May 10, 2025

Judge; Claribilda; Ms. CAT52! you are outrageous in posting fake pics on this site to get more members to your page. You want members to believe the picture you posted is yours. The evidence shows it is not. You are a complete fraud.
YOU ARE GUILTY for Violating rule 113 of this Court.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

vs.

MiniD, defendant.
___________________________/

........................COMPLAINT...........................

The Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on all evidence.


COUNT I. VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant MiniD has violated the Clean Page Act. His page is full of negative gifts.

2. Under the Clean Page Act every member must maintain their page clean at all times. The Defendant has refused to clean his page.

3. This defendant has shown disrespect for the rules and laws of this Court.


Judge Florisbinda; Mr. MiniD you're guilty of the above charges. I will give you 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.

minid a 3 inch stump cock loser! He pisses on his own small sack when he sits to pee!

You bucket of shaved ass hairs- Your page will not be safe!

Banning rat cunt!

Private Chat Log with SYSTEM. Page 1
Apr 27, 03:24 system: You were blacklisted by MiniD

Clerk of the Court; this hearing on the case of CAT52! charged with witness tampering.


SITO Members, plaintiffs,

vs.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;


COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING

1. The defendant CAT52! tampering with evidence on the case minid.

2. The evidence shows the defendant used or sent members MiniD gifts to cover the page of MiniD gifts with her gifts.

3. The defendant violated the rules of tampering with evidence.


Judge; Fredesbinda, Ms.CAT52 you're outrageous with you use your points to tamper with evidence on the case of MiniD. You are guilty of the above charges.

Clerk of the Court; This Court hearing is now open on the case of member miniD now a defendant charged with VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE.


SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,

v.

MiniD, defendant.
__________________________/

........................COMPLAINT.........................

This Court declares all statements on this complain are true based on the evidence.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.

1. The defendant MiniD has violated rule 102 which Members must maintain their page free of negative gifts at all times. Under the Clean Page Act, more than 3 negative the page is dirty and in violation of the rule.

2. The defendant has received notices to clean his page but he refused.

3. The defendant' page is dirty and in Violation of the Clean Page Act Rule for the past 2 weeks.


Judge RuFino; Mr. MiniD your are disgusting and a pig. Look at your page. You must clean you page withing the next 2 weeks or be in Contempt of Court.


4/24/25

Clerk of the Court; Pro-Temp Judge Tomasina will be presiding over this Hearing.


Hearing on the Violation of Probation
Defendant; GingerDaddy

This Court has decided to charge the defendant, GingerDaddy with Violation of Probation on his previous case. I will give this defendant an explanation on why he violated hi probation.

Judge Tomasina
4/26/25

Clerk of the Court; This Court is open for the case of CAT52!.

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!@
a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________/

........................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case;

COUNT I VIOLATION PAGE ACT

1. The defendant's profile is showing negative gifts.

2. The defendant is violating the following Clean PAGE ACT RULE, which states that each member must maintain their profile page clean of any negative gifts. A member receives a warning to clean up his/her page.

3. The defendant's page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.


COUNT II CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. The defendant in a previous Court order has been ordered to stop banned members from commenting on her page.

2. Defendant's actions are considered refusal to obey and follow the Court orders.


COUNT III SOLICITING TO CLEAN PROFILE PAGE

1. The defendant is soliciting for cleaning her page.

2. The defendant asked member, PITBULL to clean her dirty page. Member PITBULL refused her request.

3. No member shall order another member to clean a page unless they do so voluntarily.


COUNT IV ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant has violated the rule of the Immunity Member Act. Under this Act no member is allow to; defame, attack, send negative gifts or be blacklisted.

2. The defendant CAT52! violated this ACT several times when she attacked the following Immunity Memge Sir-Skittles.


Judge; RuFino; You are GUILTY of the above charges and you should refrain from making comments on blogs and forums on this site.

3/7/25

Clerk of the Court; This Court will have a hearing on the petition/ Motion of member, Sir-Skittles.

Petition to request CAT52! new name.

It has come to the attention to the Court that member CAT52! a/k/a Saggy Granny be known now as THE MULE.

The Court granted the Petition/Motion
24 April, 2025

Clerk of the Court; This Court hearing on the case of GingerDaddy charged with Chat rules violation.


SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/

....................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court declares all statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence.


COUNT I. VIOLATION CHAT RULES

1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has violated the rules of chat with; chat room abandonment.

2. The defendant has opened chat rooms as a host.

3. Defendant has abandoned his chat room leaving several members without a host. This is clear violation of the chat rules.

4. Under the rules of Chat Rooms the host must inform his members in the chat room he is leaving or closing the chat room.


JUDGE; Claribilda; Mr. GingerDaddy you opened room on this site and you leave your room without telling others you leaving . This is outrageous and unacceptable. You must follow the rules of Chat Room or don't open one. You are not above the law here. You now are in probation for 30 days. During this period you are forbidden from opening chat rooms.
You are guilty of the above charges.




4/25/25

Clerk of the Court; This Court hearing on the case of CAT52! a/k/n as The Mule former Saggy Granny has been charged with Contempt of Court. Judge Fredesbinda will be presiding over this hearing.

4/23/25


....................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................

This Court charged the defendant CAT52! with the following;

1. The defendant has attacked the judicial system including judges.

2. After her previous case decision the defendant told judge RuFino to 'kiss her ass" . This is a defiance to the Court judicial system.

3. No members are allowed to disobey, or attacked the judicial system, as member CAT52! did.

JUDGE Fredesbinda; Ms. CAT52! you are outregeous and you shown no respect for the judicial system. I will not tolerate you child behavior. You must accept this Court decisions an refrain from using vulgar language. This Court will monitor your behaviour for the next 20 days.

This hearing on the case of defendant, CAT52! charged with the following; Violation of free speech. In addition, she is now charged with; Attacking an Immunity member.


SITO members, plaintiffs,

vs.

CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/

........................COMPLAINT..........................

This Court shows that all evidence on this case to be true.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH

1. The defendant CAT52! in several times has violated the free speech on this site.

2. The Defendant has prevented members from making comments on her page.

3. The defendant willfully has prevented the following member from making comments on her page; PITBULL. This is a clear violation of free speech.


COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. Under the rules of Immunity no other member is allowed to attack an immunity member.

2. The defendant has violated this rule when she blacklisted, defame member, Sir-Skittles.


JUDGE RuFino; I found you guilty of the above charges. You must unbanned member Sir-Skittles immediately.

cat52!

Are you going to allow the retard veggie to your Easter spam dinner?