SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

......................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court shows the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. PROMOTING A SEXUAL PREDATOR

1. The defendant's ex-husband was a member of this site under the name "woody". His first legal name is Charlie.

2. The defendant's former husband committed sexual crimes against a minor child. He was in jail and on probation.

3. CAT52! has posted a picture of his former on the defendant's profile page.

COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE.

1. The defendant has destroyed case evidence on the page of member Montanaman.

2. Under the Court rules, no member is allowed to destroy evidence in a future Court case.

3. The defendant, CAT52!, has willfully decided to take evidence and destroy it.


JUDGE RuFino's case judgment: Ms. CAT52! here we go again. You will never learn from your past transgressions. You have disobey this orders from this Court, and you don't care about the consequences. Your seditious conduct is not acceptable on this site. You are now in a gag order by this Court.

November 20, 2025

SITO members,
plaintiffs,

v.

bella!,
defendant.
___________________/

.......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the evidence of this case to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant, bella! has been destroying evidence in the case of member, tecsan.

2. On November 12, 2025, the defendant destroyed all the negative gifts from the page of member tecsan.

3. The defendant intentionally and willfully destroyed case evidence with the intent to justify the defendant's conduct in a case.

Judge RuFino: This Court takes very seriously the destruction of case evidence by members. Your conduct is outrageous. I found you guilty of the above charge. You will be on probation for 30 days.

November 18, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
__________________/

.....................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the satements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE TECSAN ANTI SPAM RULE

1. The defendant violated the Tecsan Ant Spam rule.

2. Under the above rule the defendant spam the following forum; showitoff.org/forum/thread/php?id=31377.

3. No meber is allowed to spam forums wit the intent of attacking others.

COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. This Court takes very serious plagiarism. Once a member decides to copy other members comments constitutes a vioaltion inder the plagiarism rules of this site.

2. The defendant plagiarized member Sir-Skittles on the following blog; /blogs/60299.html
Skittles new car blog.

COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. This has issued a gag order against the defendant on October 18, 2025.

2. At the above time the defendant violated her probation by this Court.


JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! your conduct on this site is disgusting. You continue to attack others here daily. I suggest to stop writing blogs here. I want you to shut your mouth. I found you GUILTY of all 3 charges.

November 11, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

tecsan,
defendant.
___________________/
.........................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court declares all statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant tecsan violates the Clean Page Act.

2. The defendants' page is filthy with a lot of negative gifts.

3. Other members have complained about the defendant's. page.


Judge RuFino Judgment: Mr. tecsan is time to clean your page. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Order you to clean your page within 20 days, or I will hold you in Contempt of Court.

November 17, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
___________________/

.....................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING

1. The defendant, CAT52!, has destroyed evidence in the case of member tecsan.

2. The defendant was aware that the member tecsan had an open case with this Court, and she tampered with all the evidence in his case.

COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. The defendant has shown disrespect for this Court for all the comments she made on the November 17, hearing date.

2. No member is allowed to show disregard for this Court's decisions and judgments.

COUNT III. PERJURY

1. This Court takes very seriously cases of perjury.

2. The defendant lied about his age repeatedly.

3. Defendant has lied to members of this site, claiming she is 73, when in fact she is 81 years old.


JUDGE CLARISBINDA: Ms. CAT52! You are a big liar. How many other lies will you continue to make? The facts of this case show you are not telling the truth about your age. You also have shown no respect for the laws and rules of this site. I think you should be impeached again. You are guilty of the above charges.

November 14, 2025

SITO MEMBERS,
plaintiffs,

v.

tecsan,
defendant.
__________________/

....................COMPLAINT...............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document ot be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH

1. The defendant tecsan has violated the rules of free speech.

2. The defendant attacked member smalltits blog.

3. Under the rules of free speech, the defendant has violated the constitutional right of every member to express themselves.


JUDGE CLARISBINDA: Mr. tecsan attacking another member's opinion is not right. Every member should have the right to give their opinions on this site. I found you guilty of the above charge.

November, 7 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

GingerDaddy,
defendant.
___________________/
......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT

1. The evidence shows the defendant abandoned his chat room on October 29, 2025.

2. Defendant was there for 2 hours and decided to leave his room without informing his chat room guest that he was
leaving.

3. This defendant his a repeat offender on this charge and shall not open char rooms.


JUDGE Clarisbinda. Mr. GingerDaddy, you are guilty of the above charges. This Court will order you to take the 101 Chat Room Guidelines on managing a chat room on this site.

November 2, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v

CAT52! A/K/A Boner Killer
defendant.
____________________________/

.....................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. POSTING AN OBSOLETE PICTURE

1. The defendant has posted an obsolete picture on the site's front page for the past 2 weeks.

2. The photograph in question shows her vagina. This picture was taken 10 years ago.

3. The defendant claims the picture was taken recently.

4. Our investigators also discovered the picture was enhanced to look like a big vagina.


COUNT II. DESTROYING EVIDENCE CASE LISAVEGA.

1. The defendant destroyed all evidence in the case of LisaVega. She removed all negative gifts from her page.

2. The defendant violated the rules of Witness Tampering.


COUNT III. DESTROYING EVIDENCE CASE FATUGLYKATE

1. The defendant destroyed evidence in the case of member Fatuglykate. She removed all negative gifts from her page.

2. As COUNT I, the defendant violated the rules of Witness Tampering.


JUDGE RuFino: Ms CAT52! I see that you have stopped your criminal activities after being impeached last month. You are an undesirable member of this site. I found you guilty of the above charges, and you should be on probation for 30 days.

October 31, 2025

SITO members,
plaintiffs

v.


Fatuglykate,
defendant.
__________________/

.....................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act. Her page is dirty with negative gifts.

2. This Court has demanded that the defendant clean her page, but she refuses.

3. This Court declares this defendant a very hostile member.


JUDGE RuFino: Ms. Fatuglykate, it's time to clean your page. You have 20 days to clean your page or face Contempt of Court proceedings. You are guilty of violating the Clean Page Act.

October 27, 2025

SITO members, plaintiff,

v.

LisaVega, defendant.
___________________________/

......................COMPLAINT..........................

The Court declares all statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant LisaVega has violated the Clean Page Act rule. Her page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks.

2. The defendant refused to clean her page; therefore, she is a hostile member of this site.


Judge; Tomasina: Miss LisaVega, this Court has given you enough time to clean your page. You are responsible for keeping your page clean at all times. I found you guilty of the above charge. You have 30 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.

October 25, 2025

CAT52! Hearing
October 20, 2025


.................VIOLATION OF PROBATION......................

This Court shows evidence that defendant, CAT52! has violated the terms of her probation. The defendant violated a Gag Order of October 18, 2025.

The defendant made comments on the front page of this site. Therefore, she violated the terms of this order.

SITO Court Judges

SITO Members
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny
defendant.
______________________________/

......................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT. I DISRESPECTFUL TO THE COURT

1. The evidence shows the defendant has been disrespectful to this Court and the judges.

2. On October 17, 2025, the Court entered a final judgment on the defendant's case.

3. The defendant CAT52! Bullied this Court with the comments she made on a discussion forum; STUFF III.

4. The defendant attacked Chief Justice RuFino's decision.


JUSTICE PRO-TEMP Tomasina; Ms. CAT52! You have shown disregard for this Court and all the legal institutions of this land. You have created a hostile environment for yourself and this Court. I will enter a gag order.
This order will be for 20 days to remain silent and respect this Court's decision at all times.

October 18, 2025

SITO members,
plaintiffs,

v.

bjuk,
defendant.
_________________/

.......................COMPLAINT...........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant, bjuk has violated the Clean Page Act rule.

2. Under the Clean Page Act, each member must maintain his/her page clean from any negative gifts.

3. The defendant's page is filthy with more than 3 negative gifts.

4. The defendant refused to clean his page.


Judge Tomasina-pro temp Judge;
Mr. bjuk, your page is disgusting and must be cleaned immediately. You have 20 days to clean your page. I found you guilty of violating the Clean Page Act.

9/27/25

SITO Court members,
plaintiffs

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
_____________________/

...................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all he statements in this document are true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant destroyed case evidence.

2. Defendant destroyed evidence on the case of LisaVegas, who was charged with Violation of the Clean Page Act.

3. The defendant, CAT52! deleted all negative gifts from LisaVega's page without any authorization from this Court.


COUNT II. LYING ABOUT HER AGE

1. The defendant claims she is 77 years old.

2. Several investigations have confirmed that the defendant is 80 years old and not 77 years old.


COUNT III. POSTING FAKE PICTURES

1. Defendant continues to post fake pictures on this site.

2. The evidence shows she posted a fake picture of her vagina on the front page of this site with the intent to attract more men to her page.

3. She posted a photoshopped picture to enhance a bigger vagina with fewer wrinkles and more pubic hair.


Judge RuFino; Ms. CAT52! I see you haven't learned anything from your impeachment. You are still violating rules, and your conduct here is outrageous. I suggest cleaning up your act to avoid more charges to your record. I found you guilty of the above charges. You will be on probation for 30 days.


10/17/25

SITO members,
plaintiffs,

vs.

tecsan,
defendant.
__________________/

.......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act. Under this Act, members must maintain their pages clean of any negative gifts.

2. The defendant has been advised to clean his page, but he refused.

3. This defendant has shown disregard for keeping his page clean at all times.

Chief Justice RuFino; Mr. tecsan is time to clean your filthy page. What are you waiting? Don't expect others to clean your own mess. You are responsible for cleaning your filthy page. I found you guilty of violation of the Clean Page Act.
You have 20 days to clean your page or face Contempt of Court.


10/16/25