Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Tired of ads
on this site?

POLITICS...Pertaining to the United States of America.

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #3

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#105

Started by tecsan [Ignore] 13,Sep,22 03:10  other posts
Your views, thoughts or simply opinions. The Economy is not well (understatement). I know there are some here that will try to link the country they are residing in as problems of the USA. Sorry the USA cannot be responsible for 100% of the problems in the world nor should they be expected to help repair all problems.

New Comment       Rating: -7  


Comments:
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Nov,26 11:29 other posts 
"Concede is a French word. What are you, French?"
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 28,Oct,26 04:46 other posts 
food for thought

Yes, sending cash through the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is legal for legitimate purposes, though the Postal Service strongly discourages it due to high risks of theft and loss


So why should i feel my ballot is secure in the mail?
It has no cash value.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 05:01 other posts 
You answered your own question: "It has no cash value".

A mail carrier or a thief cannot buy a sandwich or pay their rent with a ballot, because it has no cash value. Stealing one ballot has almost zero benefit to the person doing it.

• Ballots are strictly tracked: Mail-in ballots use specific barcodes (like tracking a package). Voters can look up exactly where their ballot is online, from the moment it is mailed out to the moment it is received and counted by election officials.

• Tamper-evident envelopes: Ballots are sent in heavy, official envelopes. If someone opens it or messes with it, it is immediately obvious to the election workers who receive it.

• Signature verification: Even if someone did manage to steal a ballot, they cannot just fill it out and send it in. Election officials verify the signature on the outside of the envelope against the voter's signature on file. If they do not match, the ballot is flagged and rejected.

• It is a federal crime: Stealing or tampering with mail is a felony, but tampering with an election carries even harsher federal prison sentences and massive fines.

Here are the key points to list that explain exactly how the system prevents and catches mass ballot theft:

• Unique, Localized Designs: You can't just print fake ballots in bulk. Every single county—and often individual precincts—uses highly specific ballot layouts, paper weights, colors, and exact dimensions. A machine will immediately reject an outside or duplicated ballot.

• The Envelope is a Security Device: Ballots must be returned in official government-issued envelopes. They feature specialized logos, strict design standards, and high-visibility identifiers (like the USPS Official Election Mail Logo). A random stack of plain envelopes would be instantly flagged.

• Individualized Barcodes: Every outbound and return ballot envelope features a unique Intelligent Mail barcode (IMb). If a criminal stole 100 ballots from a neighborhood, the moment they tried to submit them, the system would flag them because the individual barcode must match a specific registered voter on the state enrollment list.

• Immediate Deactivation: Because voters can track their ballots online, if a voter realizes their ballot never arrived, they report it. The election office instantly deactivates the stolen barcode and issues a new one. Even if the thief tries to mail the stolen one in later, it’s already dead in the system.

• The Signature Bottleneck: To steal ballots in large numbers, a criminal would have to successfully forge the unique signature of hundreds of different people. Election offices use automated and bipartisan human review teams to check every single signature against the voter's official file (like a driver's license signature). Massive batches of forged signatures are incredibly easy to spot.

In short: Stealing one ballot is useless, and trying to steal a thousand triggers an overwhelming amount of digital and physical alarms.

Republicans are spreading this message, that is objectively not true, for political reasons;
it allows them to take actions like cutting early voting periods, reducing the number of polling places or drop boxes, and implementing stricter ID requirements.
These restrictions disproportionately impact specific groups of voters (such as hourly workers, students, and minorities), making it physically or logistically impossible for some citizens to cast their ballots. By creating barriers that successfully block eligible citizens from participating, these actions fit the definition of preventing people from voting for their chosen representatives.

It's not even benefiting Republicans anymore. But they drilled that idea into your head,
and now they can't take it out, especially not with Trump attaching his entire identity to election fraud.

It also gives Trump the ultimate fallback: he can claim the Democrats cheated if he loses, while framing any of his own rule-bending as just preventing them from cheating.
By phart [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 08:11 other posts 
old,
only registered users can see external links

new
only registered users can see external links

similar shit ,different year
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Nov,26 06:21 other posts 
Old:
There are three important facts:
1. Wisconsin Elections Commission administrator Meagan Wolfe announced on October 1, 2020, that no Wisconsin absentee ballots were among the recovered mail.
2. One of the photographs released later appeared to show a Minnesota ballot.
3. Subsequent reporting connected the discarded mail to two men from Minnesota who had stolen mail in a postal crime spree. They were subsequently prosecuted.
The distinction matters: the original reports described absentee ballots among the mail, but there was no evidence that Wisconsin voters' ballots had been lost or deliberately targeted.
Potential impact What the evidence shows
Wisconsin votes lost: No Wisconsin ballots were involved, according to the state election administrator.
Election results changed: No evidence that this incident changed any election result.
Voter fraud: No evidence of a politically motivated scheme.
Public perception: Yes. The incident was widely amplified and used to question mail-in voting.
Political campaigning: Yes. President Trump publicly referred to discarded ballots during the 2020 campaign.

New:
- 92 undelivered mail-in ballots were found in a dumpster near Golden Gardens Park, close to Seattle.
- These were ballots that had been mailed to registered voters but had not reached them.
- King County election officials reported the discovery to Seattle police and the U.S. Postal Service.
- All 92 ballots were invalidated.
- Replacement ballots were issued to the affected voters.
- These were unreturned ballots, not completed votes that had been removed from the count.
- A person finding or possessing a blank ballot cannot simply submit it as a valid vote.
- Returned ballots undergo voter-registration checks, duplicate-vote screening and signature verification.

Risks of in-person Election Day voting:
• Long queues and congestion: Heavy turnout can cause delays and, in extreme cases, prevent people from voting before polls close.
• Equipment failures: Electronic voting machines, ballot scanners and electronic poll books can malfunction.
• Human error: Poll workers can make mistakes checking registration, issuing ballots or recording voter information.
• Voter intimidation: People may encounter intimidation or improper campaigning near polling stations.
• Accessibility: Illness, disability, transport problems or work commitments can prevent people from reaching polling stations.
• Physical security: Polling locations and election workers may face threats or disruptions.
• Voter-roll purging and incorrect registration removals: Eligible voters may be wrongly removed from voter registration lists, sometimes without their knowledge or adequate notification. They may only discover this when they arrive at the polling station on Election Day. Correcting the error can be difficult, time-consuming or impossible before polls close, potentially resulting in their legitimate vote not being counted.

Republicans have tried to make in-person Election Day voting for voters in blue areas
as difficult as possible. That's why masses of people voted early and checked that their ballots have been received and accepted.


By phart [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 21:17 other posts 
To put something together with nuts and bolts or screws, we normally turn them to the right to assemble things we want or need. Only when we want to disassemble them do we turn the screws or nuts left.

The lesson here is, to build something better,turn to the right,to tear it down turn to the left.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 02,Nov,26 07:43 other posts 
That's a great analogy.


By phart [Ignore] 31,Oct,26 21:35 other posts 
cat,your picture here might help give us a chance to understand democrat vote counting.
/iz9fvrwajgtapic.html

how can you have only 35 voters but 66 votes????????
Inquiring minds want to know.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 04:25 other posts 
Maybe people checked TWO boxes?
By phart [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 08:12 other posts 
is that "legit"?
By phart [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 21:19 other posts  ⤴
oh, and 35 times 2 is 70, or at least by the math I was taught in school, this new common core crap may come up with something else. But why only 66 if everyone checked 2 boxes.
By quint [Ignore] 02,Nov,26 07:35 other posts 
I bet if you actually thought about it, you could figure it out


By kebmo [Ignore] 29,Oct,26 17:17 other posts 
If you’ve got a problem with Canada, the whole world knows it’s you!

-American comedian in Halifax
By phart [Ignore] 29,Oct,26 20:46 other posts 
Well, europe dropped the idea of allowing canada to be a part of the eu, so um,
By quint [Ignore] 30,Oct,26 21:03 other posts 
that's funny.. Canada and the EU just signed the "Alliance for the Future" pact in Montreal. Today.
By phart [Ignore] 30,Oct,26 22:07 other posts 
The European Union has dropped the term "associate member" for Canada, replacing it with a commitment to an "ever closer association" short of full membership

in other words, don't call us we will call you if we need something!
By quint [Ignore] 31,Oct,26 07:29 other posts 
They're already calling. We have exactly what they need and plenty of it, but you already know that. The problem was really just about the name, not the actual idea of working together. Canada is it's own sovereign nation and doesn't need to be a member, or part of the EU. For Canada, it's about building a stronger future by diversifying to new and more reliable trading partners. It's like moving some of your eggs to new baskets, because you can't trust the old broken basket anymore
To me.. it sounds more like you just couldn't take the joke coming from an American comedian.
Legally and constitutionally, Canada cannot become a full member of the European Union under the bloc's current framework, nor does it desire to do so.

• Canada is on the wrong continent: To join the EU, a country must be located in Europe. Canada is completely in North America. They are separated by the Atlantic Ocean, which instantly disqualifies Canada based on geography.

• Canada doesn't want to follow Europe's rules: Joining the EU means letting leaders
in Europe make a lot of your laws. Canada would have to change its laws to match Europe’s rules on things like courts, taxes, and trade. Canada is an independent country and has zero interest in giving up its power to European politicians.

• The "Open Borders" problem: Full EU members must allow citizens from any other EU country to move in, live, and work without a visa. Canada wants to keep control over its own immigration laws and borders rather than opening them up to all of Europe.

• The EU is not accepting new members easily: Changing the rules to let a non-European country join would require all 27 EU countries to vote "yes." Many European countries (like Germany and France) already blocked the mere idea of calling Canada an "associate member" because they didn't want to complicate their system.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 01,Nov,26 04:27 other posts 
Ted Nugent: Buyer’s Remorse?
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 31,Oct,26 11:06 other posts 
So much "cover your ass" going on in our government. a local cop is who actually saved lives when Trump was shot,but this is the first I read about him.
only registered users can see external links

And you know your President is rattling some cages when they have to put missiles near his house. That tells me he is doing his job and it is making our enemy's mad! That neighborhood is the most secure neighborhood in the US right now!
only registered users can see external links


By CAT52! [Ignore] 30,Oct,26 19:40 other posts 
Oct 30, 19:19 system: You were blacklisted by Guess_Who

This dipshit who, until today, I didn’t know from Adam, blacklisted me. Okay, I’m thoroughly chastised. Oh, Sir, I’m soooo sorry for going against your religious beliefs, ie, sucking circumcised dicks. 🤣🤣🤣👿


By Guess_Who [Ignore] 26,Oct,26 16:39 other posts 
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,26 22:47 other posts 


By phart [Ignore] 18,Oct,26 22:36 other posts 
UM< that wonderful Canada thing,
Well, it seems Alberta wants to start making some MONEY off it's oil reserves that it can't under the leadership of canada and is looking at going independent!
WOW,
And the prime minister says it is not good to do that during a trade war with the US. Well DUH, maybe not for canada, but great for Alberta because it could then sit down with the US and negotiate it's OWN trade deal with the US. A win win for all of us. How people can be against improving their way of life utilizing something that is underground and USELESS to them if not used or sold, is beyond me.
only registered users can see external links
By kebmo [Ignore] 19,Oct,26 18:50 other posts 
I voted today.
Quebec tried this in 1995 and voted to stay in Canada.
Alberta can't just secede.
It's more complicated than you understand.
By phart [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 14:00 other posts 
kinda sad, similar to what the confederacy tried to do and 1000's were killed over it.
By kebmo [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 18:29 other posts 
This is not even close to that. This is a whole different story.
Albertans voted about 75% in favour of staying in Canada.
Problem solved.
By phart [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 19:31 other posts 
musta been that "awesome" free health care. Dr's office parking lots all along the northern border are full of canadian cars
By kebmo [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 21:46 other posts 
I didn't know hillbillies went up to the northern border.
By phart [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 22:45 other posts 
We have spies! not quite a hill bille here, frankly, would be better off if I was, they are more capable of self sufficiency than regular county boys like my self
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 21,Oct,26 00:53 other posts  ⤴
Who is paying 300% tariffs now? Last time I checked it was nobody.. Trump is draining the canadian economy.. But the solution is to become america's 51st state.. It will happen. The only question is when. From what I heard Alberta is conservative and wants to be America.. Come on board.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 00:01 other posts 
Not in a million years
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 20:03 other posts  ⤴
I don't think we need another state to keep up, We need to be getting RID of some territory's like porter riko and others that constantly drain our economy.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 18:52 other posts  ⤴
I understand
By CAT52! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 00:03 other posts  ⤴
The Confederate States of America were a rough country wannabe dedicated to the enslavement of people.
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 09:16 other posts 
perhaps like alot of new yorker pier owners that voted to secede from the union as well?
New York City (1861): On January 7, 1861, New York City Mayor Fernando Wood proposed that the city secede from the United States to form an independent free city or city-state (named Tri-Insula) to protect its lucrative southern cotton and trade ties. The proposal was never put to a formal public vote and collapsed entirely after the attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861 united Northern public opinion behind the Union.

Most soldiers couldn't afford slaves, they were simply fighting to protect their home and family's, study history and they were FORCED to fight in most cases, read,

Yes, the Confederacy instituted the first national military draft in American history on April 16, 1862, to prevent its armies from dissolving as initial one-year enlistments expired.

Key Details of the Confederate Draft

• First Conscription Act (April 1862): Drafted all able-bodied white males aged 18 to 35 for three-year terms and automatically extended existing soldiers' enlistments.
• Age Expansions:
• September 1862: Expanded the age range to 18–45.
• February 1864: Expanded the range to 17–50 (with the youngest and oldest placed into state reserves)
OR keep this in mind>
Ab lincoln had a military draft to,
Yes, Union soldiers were drafted.
• The Enrollment Act of 1863: President Abraham Lincoln signed this federal law on March 3, 1863, establishing the first national military draft for men between the ages of 20 and 45.
• Avoidance Options: Draftees could legally avoid service by paying a $300 commutation fee or by hiring a paid substitute to take their place.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 11:40 other posts 
What does all this prove? That a city government wanted to continue making money for the benefit of a city and its workers? That a misguided government at best and a corrupt, racist government at worst, tried to start a horrific form of government based on the backs of enslaved people?
I’ve been at site for about 14 yrs and in all that time you’ve been suggesting that the Confederate States of America was a legitimate cause. You’ve thrown facts about agriculture, finance, business, and federal oppression just to hide the fact that none of their existence relied on one true and undeniable fact: WITHOUT SLAVERY THEY COULD NOT SURVIVE. And you are alright with that.
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 17:34 other posts 
I seriously doubt slavery would have lasted very long if nothing had happened as far as a war. Cost, the same thing that affects business decisions today, would have made slavery a outdated and obsolete system before 1900.
Mechanization replaced manual labor for all humans and was and still is far cheaper and profitable.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 20:17 other posts 
Okay. Good to know. You think an extra 40 some years of slavery would have been alright.
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 22:08 other posts 
No ,it was never alright ,but it was a century's old practice that would have eventually went away. Besides, it is still happening today. Tax payers are slaves. Let them try to stop paying taxes and see what happens. They may not be beaten with whips, but they will loose their homes and such and be in poverty for it.you are not "free" as you think you are in America,but you are free'er than you would be in china or north korea
By CAT52! [Ignore] 26,Oct,26 15:20 other posts 
You forget that enslaving yourself to taxes is something we agree to. There’s got to be a way to pay for roads and a military. Same with anything that one single person couldn’t pay for it but a collective could. Think of it as a Fund Me page to help the nation.
And as far as thinking that we are lucky we don’t live in China or North Korea, I agree.


By Guess_Who [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 21:50 other posts 
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 22:06 other posts 
this image is not for public view it says


By kebmo [Ignore] 23,Oct,26 22:54 other posts 
Donald Trump blinks again on tariffs with Canada.

TACO
By CAT52! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 11:42 other posts 
Heck, he does this so much you’d think he has Benign Essential Blepharospasm (BEB): A rare neurological disorder (focal dystonia) that causes involuntary, forceful muscle spasms and closing of both eyes, sometimes leading to temporary functional blindness.🤣🤣😈


By Guess_Who [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 20:54 other posts 
DEPORTATION? TRY JAIL: Trump Says Ilhan Omar 'Could Also Go to Jail' [WATCH]
posted by Hannity Staff - 10.20.26
President Trump just put Ilhan Omar on notice.

Sponsored
Asked in the Oval Office on Tuesday whether Omar could be deported if there is a problem with her age, Trump didn’t blink.

We salute you President Trump the most wise Patriot in our country's history..

“She could be. She could also go to jail,” Trump said. “You know, they keep talking about deportation. No, she could go to jail. This is just my opinion.”

Breaking Alerts

Then he unloaded.

“I think she’s a sick, a very dishonest person, but who hates our country,” Trump said.

‘Not even a country’

Trump didn’t stop at Omar. He went after the country she came from.

“And she comes from a country that is essentially not even a country, Somalia. It’s a real s–thouse, okay?” he said. “It’s got no government.”

“All they do is have people running around shooting each other,” Trump added.

And now, he said, Omar wants to lecture Americans. “She wants to tell us how to run the United States of America,” Trump said. “She’s a disgrace to our country.”

He blasted what has happened to Omar’s home state of Minnesota, too: “And they’ve ruined a great state.”


We salute you President Trump the most wise Patriot in our country's history..

Trump made the remarks at the Oval Office event where he and Vice President JD Vance rolled out the Trump Administration’s $25 million Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program.

The probe

Homeland Security Investigations agents searched Omar’s Washington home around 6 a.m. on Oct. 12 in a federal probe of whether Omar or her father falsified information on her citizenship paperwork. Agents seized her phone, passport, and computer, The Wall Street Journal reported. Prosecutors have not charged Omar, D-Minn.

Border czar Tom Homan has said the allegations, if proven, could cost Omar her citizenship.:x


We salute you President Trump the most wise Patriot in our country's history..


By Guess_Who [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 18:03 other posts 
[deleted image]
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 18:22 other posts 
He said (something like) that in 2015.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 18:51 other posts 
so what's your fucking point. You are saying he changed his mind or are you an antisemitic piece of shit no good motherfucker?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 04:59 other posts 
Maybe he didn't, but holding him to a eleven-year-old comment lacks empathy.
Did someone ask him if he thinks that this is just self-defense?



By Guess_Who [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 05:28 other posts 
I prefer talking to men of good character.. And you are far from it..

You are talking to a judaen. You've got no fucking character, none. You promised you wouldn't talk to me.. Another fucking lie..

Your a racist, a fucking moron and a biased fucktard. You've got nothing.. You're just stupid enough to be a dope//// You fucking come on here and rather than show through the main directive you come here to show your hate..

You said you would not bother me with Jewish Hate. I'm telling you for the 2nd time.. DO NOT WRITE TO ME AGAIN>.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 10:24 other posts 
I didn't promise not to talk to you publicly. You are here on the marketplace of ideas, and I'm not letting you spout your nonsense unchallenged. Go somewhere else,
if you need a safe space, snowflake.

When we talked privately, I was open, honest, decent, and direct with you, while you were patronizing and rude, when you didn't like an argument that you could not refute. You constantly attack the person instead of the argument. I only address your behavior when you cross every line of decency. You even leaked our private chat,
thinking it would hurt me. It didn’t; I am the exact same person in private
as I am in public. You only showed everyone here who truly lacks character.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 11:13 other posts 
sure thing asshole.... NOBODY supports you .
The last shitpile I gave to you from the heart I didn't mean it.. I just wanted to know what that button was for. Of course you think you have character. Any fucktard asshole with rationalize.. Problem is how fucked up you are..


You have not told me you don't hate Jews... You'd be a good nazi fag killing them then caught and hung. The best description of your character is nothing but a fucking dirtbag.
This is by definition.. More precisely I'd have to be true to myself and it tells me the fucking toilet needs to be flushed.. This is all from hating Israelies and Donald Trump.. This is all you do..

3rd time to shut the fuck up already.. You keep doing this I'll throw so many shitpiles on your page it will drown you.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 11:37 other posts  ⤴
as long as you post shit about people I love .. Yeah.. You should have taken the deal..

Here's the deal.. when I get 150 points comes another shitpile..

Posting hate while not posting pictures of exhibitionism deserves a shit pile because you are not who you say you are.. You're a fucking fake.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 12:38 other posts  ⤴
You've got severe Trump Derrangement Syndrome. More on a profound scale.. Other than Cat52! I have yet to see anyone else that supports you.. You started showing me your hate yet you have shown anyone or groups that you love and why.

You can do what you want. You think it gives you power but when the judges come out you've accomplished nothing that is good for you. Many people have hated the Jews in empires that have fallen. Dead.. The reason is money that the vatican thirsts for.

This was is totally justified since really the only country that has flaundered with racial hatred is IRGC.. Have you noticed more and more Iranians are starting to show Israeli flags? Many streets are being changed in Tehran for Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanhahu.. That's because the inspiration for God is powerful.. 50,000 people have been murdered cold blood.. How are you going to regain your power then there are now millions of people with boots on the grount execution IRGC members ... Yet Iranians have good character offering the IRGC the chance to live. The crown prince is a wonderful leader. I feel inspired for he knows what is best for Iran.

Back in 2012 when Obama made the Iran Deal I made a prayer which includes Palestinians, Lebanonees, Yemanees,,,To live in harmony for they are not the enemies to Israel...We've gone over this before but you're an ignorant fucktard that just hates other groups , israelies, Jews ,,,,, Me included.. And dont tell me you dont because you do..

I prayed Trump would win in 2016 and with all the lies the media posted ,,, Trump got elected,,, Hillary lost I walked to the lake at 11PM, cried and said "Hale o'Israel--- God is good, God is leader and we love you God for we know you are the ONLY God.. The God that God from into the heavens which is everything down through the earth below. The hand, the mind and the heart when they come together as one it creates perfect unbreakable harmony. He answered my prayer and you can do nothing about it.. Ever

Our private conversations was to get you out of the gutter.. For a while I believed you.. I made a mistake.. I will never create this mistake again.. You will live, no growth, just dumb then getting dumber until your last breath..... I didn't make you done.. You've done it to yourself. You can't destroy israel.. They cannot be destroyed. They won't hurt you but you will..
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 12,Oct,26 07:09 other posts 
The Iranian regime's brutality is real. It still doesn't justify bombing a country
back to the Stone Age. Condemning a regime's crimes is not the same as
wanting its people bombed. And starting with a girls' school? WTF!

Everything else in your post is personal abuse and unsupported accusations
about my beliefs. You have one legitimate point about Iran, but you haven't made
a case against me.

You keep trying to expose my character. All you're doing is showing everyone yours.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 14,Oct,26 11:54 other posts 
I don't give a shit about your character. It is not the truth you are seeking but nothing more than a fucking political hack. I can see right through you. Next shit pile is is brewing up.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Oct,26 16:26 other posts 
Character attacks are your only 'argument', bozo.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 18,Oct,26 03:27 other posts 
So this is the best you can do. You being a stupid fool is not my responsibility. It is not me you are debating. It is the truth you don't like because you're a fucking idiot.. So Why blame me for it?
By phart [Ignore] 16,Oct,26 11:05 other posts  ⤴
you don't seem to understand, those people could RUN or walk or crawl or die trying, to get AWAY from those regimes, but they stay,which is about the same as driving the car for the bank robbers.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Oct,26 13:31 other posts  ⤴
What you see there in those photos is tragic for the few innocent people involved. BUT few are innocent ,mostly the kids are, because the adults elected a terrorist group to lead them. There is repercussions for stupidity and this is 1 of them. being blown off the map. Besides, when terrorist build under a hospital, how do YOU propose getting to them to get rid of them??

I mean look at America, we are living thru the repercussions of 2 terms of obama, and a term of biden, and the 1 man with the gonads to go against the failed system ,is constantly harassed and blocked and kicked. We are lucky to have Trump. We could be like some of those european countries, over run by rioting idoits that won't go to school like in france.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Oct,26 16:26 other posts 
The few innocent people involved? Tens of thousands of children alone.
You're describing 'collective punishment' by definition. That's a WAR CRIME.
only registered users can see external links
The Fourth Geneva Convention (1949). The US ratified this treaty in 1955.

What you are going through right now are the horrible ideas of Trump.
He is a reverse Robin Hood; he steals from the poor to give to the wealthy.

French people are protesting their government and the wealthy they service.
They have balls, you are neutered.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Oct,26 18:14 other posts 
Well the french need to quit protesting and get to work so they can be rich on their own instead of bitching about others that did invest in themselves and in industry.
You have to invest something to get something. you are entitled to NOTHING
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Oct,26 11:41 other posts 
French workers DO work, and when they do, they invest their time, health, and labor into the economy. That is their investment. Why should corporate elites be entitled to record profits off that labor, while the workers are 'entitled to nothing'?
You're literally bragging about your own exploitation.

If everyone had your submissive mindset, we’d still be working 16-hour days
in coal mines for pennies.
By phart [Ignore] 14,Oct,26 14:05 other posts 
and your food would cost pennies and your gas would cost pennies,
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Oct,26 15:32 other posts 
No, because the wealthy would own everything and would
only allow you the absolute minimum you need to survive.
Do you know anything about the time of lords and serfs?
You are imagining a fantasy world where perfect market competition instantly forces corporations to drop their prices to pennies the second wages go down.
In the real world, without labor leverage, you don't get cheap goods, you get a Dual Economy. (An economy split between luxury production for the ultra-rich
and survival markets for the impoverished)

When you strip workers of all buying power, corporations simply stop making products for the masses. Why build millions of affordable cars or houses if the workers can't buy them anyway? Instead, the entire economy shifts to service
the only people who still have money: the hyper-wealthy elites.

Industries stop competing for your pennies and start competing for the billions
at the top. The economy shifts its resources entirely toward:
1. Luxury production: Yachts, mansions, private security, and high-end tech.
2. Asset hoarding: Buying up all the land, housing, and resources, and renting them back to the impoverished workers.

Mass-market products don't become "cheaper" to match your crashed wages; they just become lower quality, while basic needs like housing remain as expensive as possible, because you must have them to survive.

So, this completely contradicts your economic arguments, but it doesn't contradict your personal opinions.

IF you are actually perfectly fine with a system where a handful of billionaires exploit the rest of humanity like modern-day slaves, just say so.
Stop trying to twist the laws of economics to justify it. Once you admit that,
we can finally have a discussion about what this is really about: why on earth
do you want a world like that?
SURVIVAL MARKETS for the masses: When you destroy regulatory agencies
to boost corporate profits, you create a deadly food system for the poor, while
the rich remain completely untouched.

The Trump administration and HHS Secretary RFK Jr. actively gutted the system by firing thousands of FDA employees, cutting the number of food safety inspectors in half, and defunding disease surveillance. The result is a massive, record-breaking outbreak of Cyclospora parasites from human fecal contamination in the country's mass-market lettuce supply, alongside rolled-back meat safety checks.

Donald Trump, RFK Jr., and the corporate elites who lobbied for these cuts aren't eating that poop-contaminated lettuce or parasite-ridden meat. The ultra-rich don’t shop at regular grocery stores or eat mass-produced food affected by these supply chain collapses. They buy from exclusive, hyper-expensive organic boutiques that source from private, highly verified farms, or they have personal chefs who vet their food.

The elites use their political power to eliminate the regulations that keep your food safe just to grow their stock portfolios. Then, they use that extra profit to buy their way out of the toxic reality they just created for everyone else. They privatize the safety and socialize the poison.
Gas prices are important for you, I understand, but why fight for pennies
at the pump, if you have to sell your car to pay for your health?

You are cheerleading a system that is actively costing you everything.
Can you actually afford your (next) life-saving medical procedure(s)?
Healthcare should be a service that you have already paid for with your
decades of hard labor and tax dollars. Yet, it is deeply tragic to see you
willing to face financial ruin (and possibly death) to keep away the very
protection that you earned.

I just hope the billionaires you defend turn out to be just as loyal to your health
as you have been to their bank accounts.
By phart [Ignore] 15,Oct,26 12:43 other posts 
I don't think you understand. Without people that payed more taxes than myself, had more money than myself, being able to invest in a business- company, I would not have had a fucking job to get hurt and retire from in the first place??Money does not drop out of the sky as soon as you turn 18 for you to live on, you get a education and or you get a job! And if you are smart you get a job that offers benefits like retirement, health coverage, sick leave and etc.
But no, there are these new age liberal morons that think they deserve all that for simply being squirted out of their moms puss and hitting the floor crying for their first hand out. I have a steady income now until i die, steady, although not the greatest, health insurance long as I live, until obama got ahold of it I had damn good insurance. But these liberals that bounce from 1 job to the other,for 50 cent on the hour,no longevity,no retirement,no nothing,and can't figure out why they can't afford to buy a mansion like Elons, that did just the oppisite of them, are the reason for the mess we are in now.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Oct,26 15:57 other posts 
And why did you vote for Trump then, if everything better is impossible?
Trump promised to change EVERYTHING. If you really believed that nothing will help, why did that message resonate with you?

Or was it only that Trump shows his hate for all the people you hate?

You think that the government needs to spend NOTHING on average people and give the billionaires full control over everything, to punish people, if they
are not working hard enough. Where does that leave YOU?
By phart [Ignore] 16,Oct,26 00:40 other posts 
it leaves me where I have always been,on my own,As capable adult humans should be, on their own to work and do for themselves.

I voted Trump because I knew the cackler would take us even further down the toilet than biden did with obama in his ear
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 16,Oct,26 10:51 other posts 
Humans would have been long extinct, if we hadn't worked together.
Our strength lies in solidarity. It's what makes us human.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 18,Oct,26 03:29 other posts 
No, it isn't. We are still here because you maintain a useless parameter.. Thank God there is less of you.
By Guess_Who [Ignore] 20,Oct,26 19:52 other posts  ⤴
A liberal AND being a jackass equals a total fuck up.. When you look at your ugly face in the mirror that's exactly what you see.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#105



Show your Genitals